Investigate and fix "comment mismatch" issues

[gentlementlegen]

          > Not the first time this error pops up, I wonder if it is just OpenAI not returning the proper JSON response or the logic being flawed.

@gentlementlegen You need to implement a fix

Originally posted by @0x4007 in ubiquity-os/plugins-wishlist#25 (comment)

It seems that during some runs the comment length returned by OpenAI does not match the length of the comments that were supposedly parsed.

Example:
ubiquity/work.ubq.fi#164 (comment)
ubiquity-os/plugins-wishlist#25 (comment)

[gentlementlegen]

Since we had lots of changes (notably the prompt), I made sure to merge and re-ran the affected issues. They both ran fine. I will close this, and if the issue arises again, let's reopen.

[gentlementlegen]

Reopening due to: ubiquity-os/plugins-wishlist#50 (comment)

[gentlementlegen]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

! No price label is set to calculate the duration

[gentlementlegen]

/start

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Warning!	This task was created over 37 days ago. Please confirm that this issue specification is accurate before starting.
Deadline	Wed, Dec 4, 9:37 AM UTC
Beneficiary	0x0fC1b909ba9265A846b82CF4CE352fc3e7EeB2ED

Tip

• Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
• Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
• Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

Note

The following contributors may be suitable for this task:

rndquu

2% Match ubiquity/audit.ubq.fi#16

gentlementlegen

1% Match ubiquity-os-marketplace/daemon-pricing#47

0x4007

1% Match ubiquity/work.ubq.fi#125

[gentlementlegen]

@sshivaditya2019 is that expected?

[sshivaditya2019]

@sshivaditya2019 is that expected?

Yes, there’s a new config to always add contributors, regardless of similarity. It's probably not working well at the moment, as the database doesn’t have many completed issues yet.

[0x4007]

Regressions shouldn't be rewarded

[gentlementlegen]

I investigated for quite some time and I can't repro it locally, not even with the API, and re-running it on the related task worked. Closing for now, to be reopened I suppose.

[ubiquity-os-beta]

! Priority value is not defined

[ubiquity-os-beta]

! Priority value is not defined

[0x4007]

! Priority value is not defined

@gentlementlegen looks like it doesn't know how to handle 0