Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Kafka based consumer offsets storage #304

Open
akki opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Support Kafka based consumer offsets storage #304

akki opened this issue Jan 22, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@akki
Copy link

akki commented Jan 22, 2020

Feature request

Currently, uReplicator supports only Zookeeper based offset storage. But the newer versions of Kafka allow (and encourage) to store offsets in Kafka's built-in topic (__consumer_offset).

So, It'd be nice if uReplicator allows the option to choose offset storage (zookeeper or kafka).

Related tickets

This would also be one step closer in achieving #228.
I also found a similar request in #246 but it was closed.


So I would like to know if the maintainers would be interested to see such a feature?
@akki
Copy link
Author

akki commented Jan 22, 2020

From my understanding, to implement this feature one will need to add a KafkaCheckpointManager (like ZookeeperCheckpointManager) and hook it into the createCheckpointManager method.

If that is the right direction, I might be able to send a PR for this from one of our projects built on top of uReplicator which already has this feature.

@yangy0000
Copy link
Collaborator

yes, Kafka based consumer offsets storage is a good feature to have. it would be great if you want to contribute to this

@OneCricketeer
Copy link

What is the lifecycle of uReplicator with KIP-382 released?

@yangy0000
Copy link
Collaborator

We will keep maintaining, fixing bugs and improving the document, but we don't have any major change for uReplicator right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants