You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for providing a great library. I want to use it for my projects.
I have a question about multiple evaluations at each probe. For a function f(x) which takes a long time to run, I want to compute f(x) for a number of x values in parallel. To test this, I ran tutorial.ipynb with the following modifications:
res = policy.random_search(max_num_probes=5, simulator=simulator(),
num_search_each_probe=4)
# Originally, max_num_probes=80 and num_search_each_prob=1
# I expect that the total amount of computation is not changed
res = policy.bayes_search(max_num_probes=20, simulator=simulator(), score='TS',
interval=5, num_rand_basis=5000, num_search_each_probe=4)
Is this the right way to do parallel computation as explained above?
And I'm concerned about actual computation time. The modified code seems slower
than the original, specifically on policy.bayes_search():
I expected the computation time is proportional to the number of evaluations of f(x),
so I don't understand the significant difference. That's why I'm wondering that I'm not correct
on using parallel evaluation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi developers of combo,
Thanks for providing a great library. I want to use it for my projects.
I have a question about multiple evaluations at each probe. For a function
f(x)
which takes a long time to run, I want to computef(x)
for a number ofx
values in parallel. To test this, I rantutorial.ipynb
with the following modifications:Is this the right way to do parallel computation as explained above?
And I'm concerned about actual computation time. The modified code seems slower
than the original, specifically on
policy.bayes_search()
:Original: 99.50355625152588 [sec]
Modified: 1856.6796779632568 [sec]
I expected the computation time is proportional to the number of evaluations of
f(x)
,so I don't understand the significant difference. That's why I'm wondering that I'm not correct
on using parallel evaluation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: