Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Thank you for your feedback. I understand that requiring over 200 PRs is a pain, but isn't that a similar problem with Regarding the introduction of the However, if you have any good ideas to eliminate these concerns, we can introduce a new version declaration mechanism. What do you thunk? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
Currently in order for the aws plugin to be correctly installed it must be declared in
.tflint.hcl
withversion
andsource
parameters provided.If you skip the version parameter it complains that you cannot only use the source one by itself.
If you skip the source parameter as well it cannot download and install the plugin at all.
Now if I have 200 repos containing TF code and for each I setup a pipeline for the repo to do tflint checks, each time you release a new version I have to go and edit the .tflint.hcl file in the repo that is used by the pipeline to reflect the new version of the aws plugin.
This results in 200 commits and PRs.
Can we instead utilize a keyword in the version like
latest
or$Latest
or just make theversion
parameter optional and if not present the latest version of the plugin to be downloaded by default?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions