Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Handle edge case of recursive exceptions in failure converter #697

Open
yunmanger1 opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@yunmanger1
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It is kind of an easy mistake to do in python:

try:
    raise ValueError("test")
except Exception as e:
    raise e from e

The re-raised exception will have e.__cause__ referencing itself resulting in failure to serialize error and python sdk won't report anything resulting in retries and startToClose timeouts.

Describe the solution you'd like

Handle a case when e.__cause__ == e in DefaultFailureConverter. Created a dummy pull request #696

Additional context

https://temporalio.slack.com/archives/CTT84RS0P/p1719632201314119

@yunmanger1 yunmanger1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 3, 2024
@cretz
Copy link
Member

cretz commented Dec 3, 2024

python sdk won't report anything

I think this is the primary bug. There are situations where recursion and stack overflow can occur in serialization, and the linked PR naively only helps the case of the cause being the same as itself (but if it was two causes deep that recursed, the issue would still appear). We just need to make it clear when it happens (or any other failure serialization happens).

If we are indeed not reporting anything, we need to fix that. #685 is related when failing to build a failure.

@yunmanger1
Copy link
Author

yunmanger1 commented Dec 4, 2024

You are right that it doesn't solve all cycles. Not sure if your case happens in practice. What needs to happen to have an exception cycled after 2 or 3 steps?

Maybe the solution could be just have a max depth of 10 let's say. During serialization you truncate too deep stacks anyway.

@cretz
Copy link
Member

cretz commented Dec 4, 2024

I think we just need to log the failure of serializing this (assume there's a stack depth/overflow exception but is not visible due to #685)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants