Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: reduce GeoJson sizes / cleanup coast #9

Open
HugoGresse opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Question: reduce GeoJson sizes / cleanup coast #9

HugoGresse opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@HugoGresse
Copy link

Hi!

We are working to integrate the plants distributions from WGSRPD in Pl@ntNet services. (level2)

We are finalizing the work on our end but still have some issues:

  1. The coast definition are not exact at all. For example, in Marseille, France, part of the city is outside France:
    Capture d’écran 2022-06-15 à 14 50 29
    And for Corsica, France:
    Capture d’écran 2022-06-15 à 14 53 40

  2. The amount of details on other coasts are at the same time big and not very accurate:
    Capture d’écran 2022-06-15 à 14 50 44
    This results in very low performance when trying to display the GeoJson en embedded map on mobile devices.

My question is, would you be open to accept PR which improve this?

  • reduce the amount of point on coasts
  • keep every country land within the boundary of the defined area
@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

Hi @HugoGresse, I'm not maintaining the standard, but that seems like a good idea. Thanks for your contribution!

@HugoGresse
Copy link
Author

Thanks you @peterdesmet for the quick answer.

Would updating only the .geojson and not the other formats be ok on your side? I mean would you be able to merge a PR doing only that?

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I think reducing the size of geojson only would be fine. Also notifying maintainers @tdwg/wgsrpd @PacoPando and @NicBailly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants