You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm listing here some discussions and issues that I believe that are related to the species interaction topics.
Few people who are participating on this IG have also participated on this discussions in the past. So the ideia here is to give a update on this topics and let new members to know about what have been proposed in the past and why.
Change term - associatedTaxa (added recommendation to use dwc:ResourceRealtionship class and clarifies its usage): Change term - associatedTaxa dwc#331
From all these discussion above, it look to me that the community is moving in the direction to adopt dwc:ResourceRelationship class a pattern to share associations between records.
So, should interactions go in the same direction? It brings some thoughts to me:
What we are trying to do here?
What is the problem with dwc:ResourceRelationship for share biotic interactions?
If there is no problem with Resource Relat, then, does this class fit the needs to share basic information about biotic interactions (Ainteraction_typeB)?
What more do we need for biotic interactions beyond of identifiers (A and B) and a interaction type?
Interesting to know what people think about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi folks,
I'm listing here some discussions and issues that I believe that are related to the species interaction topics.
Few people who are participating on this IG have also participated on this discussions in the past. So the ideia here is to give a update on this topics and let new members to know about what have been proposed in the past and why.
dwc:ResourceRealtionship
class to term comments!)Change term - associatedSequences dwc#332dwc:ResourceRealtionship
class and clarifies its usage): Change term - associatedTaxa dwc#331dwc:ResourceRealtionship
class and clarifies its usage): Change term - associatedOrganisms dwc#330From all these discussion above, it look to me that the community is moving in the direction to adopt
dwc:ResourceRelationship
class a pattern to share associations between records.So, should interactions go in the same direction? It brings some thoughts to me:
dwc:ResourceRelationship
for share biotic interactions?interaction_type
B)?Interesting to know what people think about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: