New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Find and document the workflow that uses accessionWF descriptive-metadata and content-metadata steps #977

Open

jcoyne opened this issue Aug 2, 2022 · 0 comments

Contributor

jcoyne commented Aug 2, 2022

Very few items now use these steps:

https://argo.stanford.edu/report/workflow_grid?f%5Bcurrent_version_isi%5D%5B%5D=1&f%5Bprocessing_status_text_ssi%5D%5B%5D=Accessioned&f%5Bregistered_date%5D%5B%5D=days_30

Here are the content-metadata:

https://argo.stanford.edu/catalog?f%5Bcurrent_version_isi%5D%5B%5D=1&f%5Bprocessing_status_text_ssi%5D%5B%5D=Accessioned&f%5Bregistered_date%5D%5B%5D=days_30&f%5Bwf_wps_ssim%5D%5B%5D=accessionWF%3Acontent-metadata%3Acompleted

Here are the descriptive-metadata:

https://argo.stanford.edu/catalog?f%5Bcurrent_version_isi%5D%5B%5D=1&f%5Bprocessing_status_text_ssi%5D%5B%5D=Accessioned&f%5Bregistered_date%5D%5B%5D=days_30&f%5Bwf_wps_ssim%5D%5B%5D=accessionWF%3Adescriptive-metadata%3Acompleted

Find out how these are being created (are people hand crafting xml?) and document these workflows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment