WH cosmos sdk fork should be upgraded from v45 to v47

[jonathanpberger]

SDK is out-of-date
we want to be on something supported

the Wormhole fork is pretty minimal; WH only added ~100 LoC to x/staking

do this on a branch of the fork, then figure out our forking / main'ce strategy

Tasks

Preview Give feedback

1. --SPIKE: Can we upstream it? Ought we upgrade the fork?-- No, cherry picking their previous work into v47
2. implement SDK fork
3. once we're on 47: when should we think about 50?
4. @nik-suri will review https://medium.com/the-interchain-foundation/elevating-the-cosmos-sdk-eden-v0-50-20a554e16e43 to confirm there're no important product-related reasons to prioritize the upgrade.
5. Tests should pass on Wormchain-on-CosmosSDK-v47 #64
   10 of 10
   +0
   

[jonathanpberger]

@pharr117 sez "this looks consensus-breaking due to _________" (peter to provide link)

[pharr117]

Document explaining why 0.45 -> 0.47 upgrade is consensus breaking: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/RELEASES.md#0ver-dependencies

[jonathanpberger]

good candidate for @joelsmith-2019 to jump onto once he's back in the saddle

[joelsmith-2019]

@nik-suri moving conversation to GH

[jonathanpberger]

Blocked until we figure out whether we should use this fork on the Wormchain repo (see question to @nik-suri upthread)

[joelsmith-2019]

No longer blocked. We will test the sdk fork via wormchain.

[jonathanpberger]

once we're on 47: when should we think about 50?

unless it's security-related, we don't have a pressing need for 50. @nik-suri will review https://medium.com/the-interchain-foundation/elevating-the-cosmos-sdk-eden-v0-50-20a554e16e43 to confirm there're no important product-related reasons to prioritize the upgrade.

[joelsmith-2019]

Waiting on new Cosmos SDK fork tag on Wormhole's side.