Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RUSTSEC-2022-0076: Bug in Wasmtime implementation of pooling instance allocator #215

Open
standardtech-bot opened this issue Jan 14, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@standardtech-bot
Copy link

Bug in Wasmtime implementation of pooling instance allocator

Details
Package wasmtime
Version 0.33.1
URL GHSA-44mr-8vmm-wjhg
Date 2022-11-10
Patched versions >=2.0.2

Bug in Wasmtime's implementation of its pooling instance allocator when the allocator is configured to give WebAssembly instances a maximum of zero pages of memory.

In this configuration, the virtual memory mapping for WebAssembly memories did not meet the compiler-required configuration requirements for safely executing WebAssembly modules. Wasmtime's default settings require virtual memory page faults to indicate that wasm reads/writes are out-of-bounds, but the pooling allocator's configuration would not create an appropriate virtual memory mapping for this meaning out of bounds reads/writes can successfully read/write memory unrelated to the wasm sandbox within range of the base address of the memory mapping created by the pooling allocator.

This bug is not applicable with the default settings of the wasmtime crate.

This bug can only be triggered by setting InstanceLimits::memory_pages to zero.

This is expected to be a very rare configuration since this means that wasm modules cannot allocate any pages of linear memory.

All wasm modules produced by all current toolchains are highly likely to use linear memory, so it's expected to be unlikely that this configuration is set to zero by any production embedding of Wasmtime.

See advisory page for additional details.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant