You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2020. It is now read-only.
Linux VPC us-east-1e m4.2xlarge: 0 <green>
Linux VPC us-east-1e m4.xlarge: -1 <yellow>
Linux us-east-1c c4.2xlarge: -4 <yellow>
Linux VPC us-east-1e t2.small: 2 <red>
I think perhaps it may be more informative to show it as a fraction of {total_reserved}/{total on-demand}
rather than the difference between on-demand and reserved, like
Linux VPC us-east-1e m4.2xlarge: 12/12 <green>
Linux VPC us-east-1e m4.xlarge: 4/5 <yellow>
Linux us-east-1c c4.2xlarge: 3/7 <yellow>
Linux VPC us-east-1e t2.small: 8/6 <red>
Would you find this useful? If so, I don't mind doing the legwork for implementing this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using some generated data, I was able to produce this output:
where:
"Permanent" represents untagged instances (ones without no-reserved-instance
"Temporary" represents tagged instances (marked with no-reserved-instance)
"Unutilized" represents leftover reserved instances that are just burning money as they can't be associated with any running instance.
Currently, output for
audit
shows something likeI think perhaps it may be more informative to show it as a fraction of
{total_reserved}/{total on-demand}
rather than the difference between on-demand and reserved, like
Would you find this useful? If so, I don't mind doing the legwork for implementing this change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: