You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to spec, an extractedLicenseInfo has the property LicenseCrossReference which I assumed to be implemented by the class CrossRef. extractedLicenseInfo has no setter for a CrossRef object, though, only for a string collection seeAlso. Which for current purposes is totally fine as the intent to provide a URL is still taken care of. I just wondered if seeAlso should actually be a (collection of) CrossRefs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@armintaenzertng - the seeAlso collection maps directly to the tag LicenseCrossReference.
CrossRef is actually for a different purpose. It is used to record more detail about the the URL's listed in the Listed Licenses web page (e.g. if they are live). It should only be used for listed licenses today.
There is an issue in the spec repo to document these fields: spdx/spdx-spec#46
For the purposes of extractedLicenseInfo I suggest just using the seeAlso collection.
According to spec, an
extractedLicenseInfo
has the property LicenseCrossReference which I assumed to be implemented by the class CrossRef.extractedLicenseInfo
has no setter for aCrossRef
object, though, only for a string collectionseeAlso
. Which for current purposes is totally fine as the intent to provide a URL is still taken care of. I just wondered ifseeAlso
should actually be a (collection of)CrossRef
sThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: