Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make use of "percona" namespace on Opscode community site #16

Closed
patcon opened this issue Sep 1, 2012 · 7 comments
Closed

Make use of "percona" namespace on Opscode community site #16

patcon opened this issue Sep 1, 2012 · 7 comments

Comments

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented Sep 1, 2012

While I'm here, what are your thoughts on asking the current maintainers of the "official" percona cookbook on the community site, to see whether they'd be amenable to handing the namespace over to you?

http://ckbk.it/percona

It seems your cookbook is much more active and general, and it would only make sense. I imagine they'd be able to see that.

Would you be interested if they were? I can get in touch.

@phlipper
Copy link
Contributor

phlipper commented Sep 3, 2012

@patcon that works for me. Let's also see how this plays out with regards to customink-webops/percona-install#6. Thanks for the interest!

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor Author

patcon commented Sep 3, 2012

No sweat. I'll just cc these guys, as they have possession of the namespace

//cc @dje @heavywater

@patcon patcon closed this as completed Sep 3, 2012
@dje
Copy link

dje commented Sep 4, 2012

Works for me. What's the Opscode user name that will take over the cookbook?

@patcon patcon reopened this Sep 4, 2012
@patcon
Copy link
Contributor Author

patcon commented Sep 4, 2012

Thanks @dje! How about adding @phlipper, @nathenharvey & myself?
http://community.opscode.com/users/phlipper
http://community.opscode.com/users/nathenharvey
http://community.opscode.com/users/patcon

We can figure out the details once we get talking :) Obviously, if you guys at heavywater are still using it, it would be great to get your input as well.

@dje
Copy link

dje commented Sep 4, 2012

Added those accounts. Let me know when one should be promoted to "own" it I suppose.

I don't think we ever used it beyond my personal needs. I believe it's effectively abandoned at this point. I'd be happy to see a well maintained code base take its place.

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor Author

patcon commented Sep 4, 2012

that's awesome. thanks again @dje

@patcon patcon closed this as completed Sep 4, 2012
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 13, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 13, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants