You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
please never commit directly to other people branches -
I use rebase frequently, and sometimes it can create a bit of a mess if I'm unaware something changed while I was working locally. It is not the end of the world, I know how to recover, but I would like to avoid the effort =P
(The main offender is when someone clicks the “update branch” button in someone else's PR, that's why we don't recommend doing it)
I added:
I will sometimes use PRs to suggest changes to other people’s branches, which leaves them with the choice of merging, or just taking inspiration.
for way too much info: https://github.blog/2022-06-30-write-better-commits-build-better-projects/
our "unit" of work in sourmash is a PR. once it is reviewed and approved, it gets turned into one commit that shows up in the latest branch.
Inside the PR, during development? you can do as many commits you want. Like, some people even do 250 of them =P #1808
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just clarifying the process for reviewing and merging a pull request. It goes like this:
Look through changes
Click the "Add your review" above the checks, or navigate to files changed and click "review changes"
Comment, approve, or request changes (E.g. "LGTM", click approve, and click submit review)
Then click merge pull request within the pullrequest
Is there a write-up or documentation on the checks that run and which checks are selected to run?
I respond:
All but (4)! usually we leave things to the PR author to merge.
There’s no clear writeup on the checks that run, I don’t think. But the important bit is that it runs all the tests against all the versions of Python.
from a slack thread, a few links and tips we could add to docs for new sourmash developers -
@mr-eyes says:
@luizirber sez:
I added:
more @luizirber -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: