You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 23, 2022. It is now read-only.
SmallCheck has three different kinds of quantifications for properties: existential, universal and unique existential. Perhaps it would be interesting to support existential quantification alongside the current universal quantification(?)
API would follow naturally from the current Property type:
exists(Type).given(a→Bool).satisfy(a→Bool)
We'd have to gather use-cases of where existential quantification is desirable, however. While this is rather easy to add, it should be only added if the use-cases justify the increased complexity in the API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
SmallCheck has three different kinds of quantifications for properties: existential, universal and unique existential. Perhaps it would be interesting to support existential quantification alongside the current universal quantification(?)
API would follow naturally from the current Property type:
We'd have to gather use-cases of where existential quantification is desirable, however. While this is rather easy to add, it should be only added if the use-cases justify the increased complexity in the API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: