Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Kleros arbitration as an option to SafeSnap plugin #1913

Open
auryn-macmillan opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Add Kleros arbitration as an option to SafeSnap plugin #1913

auryn-macmillan opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request plugin

Comments

@auryn-macmillan
Copy link
Contributor

If a Reality Module has Kleros set as its oracle, we should expose UI elements to:

  1. request arbitration
  2. display the status of arbitration
  3. call any public functions that keep the process rolling along
@bonustrack bonustrack transferred this issue from snapshot-labs/snapshot-plugins Mar 9, 2022
@bonustrack bonustrack reopened this Mar 9, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 13, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 13, 2022
@samuveth samuveth added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 14, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 14, 2022
@samuveth samuveth added this to the Execution as core feature milestone Jun 14, 2022
@mktcode mktcode self-assigned this Aug 2, 2022
@zzuziak
Copy link
Contributor

zzuziak commented Feb 7, 2023

Hey @mktcode, what's the status of this issue?

@mktcode
Copy link
Contributor

mktcode commented Feb 8, 2023

I agree. Those controls should be added to the SafeSnap UI. In this context I was actually wondering for some time now how this plays together with the new UMA implementation and the overall design of everything. After I've put quite some time into refactoring the code, I feel like there's some significant amount of overlap/duplication.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request plugin
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants