Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: clean up target path upon storage in order to avoid merges of directories #25

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Aug 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the storage process with a cleanup procedure, ensuring a clean state before storing new data.
  • Improvements
    • Improved robustness by effectively managing both directory and file scenarios during cleanup, preventing conflicts from residual data.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@johanneskoester has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 9 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84e1133 and cd09e08.

Walkthrough

The updates to the snakemake_storage_plugin_fs module significantly enhance the store_object method by implementing a robust cleanup step before storing new objects. This ensures that any existing data, whether in a directory or as a file, is removed, thereby preventing conflicts and maintaining a clean state for new data storage.

Changes

Files Change Summary
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py Enhanced store_object method to include cleanup logic: recursively removes directory contents or deletes existing files before storage.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant StoragePlugin
    participant FileSystem

    Client->>StoragePlugin: store_object(data)
    StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Check target path
    alt Target is a directory
        StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Remove contents (shutil.rmtree)
    else Target is a file
        StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Remove file (unlink)
    end
    StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Store new object
    FileSystem-->>StoragePlugin: Confirm storage
    StoragePlugin-->>Client: Success
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0143cdd and 114ad93.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/init.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not suggest to add trailing commas.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.

Additional comments not posted (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)

211-215: LGTM! Verify cleanup logic.

The cleanup logic in store_object is well-implemented, ensuring no residual data conflicts by correctly handling both directories and files.

However, verify that the cleanup logic aligns with the intended behavior across the codebase, especially considering any potential side effects of removing existing data.

Verification successful

Cleanup logic appears isolated to store_object method.

The store_object method's cleanup logic does not seem to have external dependencies or references elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting it is self-contained.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cleanup logic in `store_object`.

# Test: Search for references to `store_object` to ensure cleanup logic is consistent with usage expectations.
rg --type python -A 5 $'store_object'

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cleanup logic in `store_object`.

# Test: Search for references to `store_object` in Python files to ensure cleanup logic is consistent with usage expectations.
rg 'store_object' --glob '*.py' -A 5

Length of output: 545

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 114ad93 and 84e1133.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/init.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not suggest to add trailing commas.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.

Additional comments not posted (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)

211-216: LGTM! Verify error handling and race conditions.

The cleanup logic in the store_object method is well-implemented. Using shutil.rmtree for directories and unlink with missing_ok=True for files is appropriate.

However, ensure that the method handles potential race conditions and errors, especially in concurrent environments.

@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit 5a9bd27 into main Aug 16, 2024
4 checks passed
@johanneskoester johanneskoester deleted the fix/cleanup-target-path branch August 16, 2024 13:03
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.0.6](v1.0.5...v1.0.6)
(2024-08-16)


### Bug Fixes

* clean up target path upon storage in order to avoid merges of
directories
([#25](#25))
([5a9bd27](5a9bd27))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant