-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: clean up target path upon storage in order to avoid merges of directories #25
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@johanneskoester has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 9 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant StoragePlugin
participant FileSystem
Client->>StoragePlugin: store_object(data)
StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Check target path
alt Target is a directory
StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Remove contents (shutil.rmtree)
else Target is a file
StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Remove file (unlink)
end
StoragePlugin->>FileSystem: Store new object
FileSystem-->>StoragePlugin: Confirm storage
StoragePlugin-->>Client: Success
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/init.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py
: Do not suggest to add trailing commas.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of theself
argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of thecls
argument of classmethods.
Additional comments not posted (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)
211-215
: LGTM! Verify cleanup logic.The cleanup logic in
store_object
is well-implemented, ensuring no residual data conflicts by correctly handling both directories and files.However, verify that the cleanup logic aligns with the intended behavior across the codebase, especially considering any potential side effects of removing existing data.
Verification successful
Cleanup logic appears isolated to
store_object
method.The
store_object
method's cleanup logic does not seem to have external dependencies or references elsewhere in the codebase, suggesting it is self-contained.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cleanup logic in `store_object`. # Test: Search for references to `store_object` to ensure cleanup logic is consistent with usage expectations. rg --type python -A 5 $'store_object'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cleanup logic in `store_object`. # Test: Search for references to `store_object` in Python files to ensure cleanup logic is consistent with usage expectations. rg 'store_object' --glob '*.py' -A 5Length of output: 545
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/init.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py
: Do not suggest to add trailing commas.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of theself
argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of thecls
argument of classmethods.
Additional comments not posted (1)
snakemake_storage_plugin_fs/__init__.py (1)
211-216
: LGTM! Verify error handling and race conditions.The cleanup logic in the
store_object
method is well-implemented. Usingshutil.rmtree
for directories andunlink
withmissing_ok=True
for files is appropriate.However, ensure that the method handles potential race conditions and errors, especially in concurrent environments.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.0.6](v1.0.5...v1.0.6) (2024-08-16) ### Bug Fixes * clean up target path upon storage in order to avoid merges of directories ([#25](#25)) ([5a9bd27](5a9bd27)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit