Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Result.m vs. with-syntax #10

Open
aMickeyChen opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Result.m vs. with-syntax #10

aMickeyChen opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@aMickeyChen
Copy link

Hi @skirino,

Pardon me for bothering you again, I am trying to make sense of Result.m.
In our current gear and antikythera code, Result.m is often used over standard library's with syntax, and the result is usually wrapped in Result.pure instead of a simple OK tuple.
What are some of the benefits of using Result.m? and what are some of the tradeoff made?

Thank you!
@aMickeyChen aMickeyChen changed the title Result.m vs. with-syntax Result.m vs. with-syntax Mar 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@aMickeyChen