-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it possible to get effect sizes for the omnibus F-test returned by mixed
?
#8
Comments
Unfortunately not at the moment. The problem is not trivial and to my knowledge no general solution has as of yet been proposed. Some discussion on this issue can be found at the lme4 faq and in Westfall et al. (2014). My recommendation is to report effects on the response scale. We have done so in e.g., Kellen et al. (2015). References:
|
See also the response at: https://afex.singmann.science/forums/topic/compute-effect-sizes-for-mixed-objects/#post-295 |
I've seen a simple solution for calculating partial eta square in some paper with LMM, which I have back tracked to:
These are available here: |
Some journals request effect sizes to be included in the analysis. I don't know if this is possible, but can a specialised effect statistic (such as eta-squared) be returned alongside the F-test? Effect sizes such as standardised beta in a LMM table are not interpretable when using sum contrast coding (especially when number of levels of a factor are >= 3).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: