Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible License-Violation GPLv2 vs. MIT #27

Open
dmth opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Possible License-Violation GPLv2 vs. MIT #27

dmth opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dmth
Copy link

dmth commented May 28, 2024

Dear all,

Whilst adding the great history-report in commit neoground@168120f from https://github.com/ngulden/niculskin to this project, there has risen a problem in mismatching FOSS licenses. This project is licensed under MIT and niculskin's historygenerator is licensed as GPLv2.

I fear there is currently no way to include GPLv2 code into a MIT-licensed project.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant