You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 27, 2024. It is now read-only.
Users will often want to expand Plate schemas while still keeping backwards compatibility with old data. Lets examine some of the ways this can play out.
Adding a new field to a sum type
100% backward compatibility with old data. Nice.
Adding a new field to a product type
Currently this always breaks backwards compatibility. We could avoid some of this in two ways: either by allowing optional fields to be missing or by allowing defaults to be set. This ties in to issue #2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Users will often want to expand Plate schemas while still keeping backwards compatibility with old data. Lets examine some of the ways this can play out.
Adding a new field to a sum type
100% backward compatibility with old data. Nice.
Adding a new field to a product type
Currently this always breaks backwards compatibility. We could avoid some of this in two ways: either by allowing optional fields to be missing or by allowing defaults to be set. This ties in to issue #2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: