Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fat gem support for Windows #15

Open
kozo2 opened this issue Jul 17, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

fat gem support for Windows #15

kozo2 opened this issue Jul 17, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kozo2
Copy link
Member

kozo2 commented Jul 17, 2016

condaのシステムを使ってbinary gemを配布できるか否か
(特にwindows)

参考link

@kozo2 kozo2 self-assigned this Jul 17, 2016
@v0dro
Copy link

v0dro commented Aug 3, 2016

Do we need a package manager like conda? Rubygems has worked fine for me so far.

@kozo2 kozo2 changed the title conda の調査 fat gem support for Windows Aug 3, 2016
@kozo2
Copy link
Member Author

kozo2 commented Aug 3, 2016

@v0dro I replaced the title from conda to fat gem support for Windows.
What I wanted to discuss is binary gem.
It is hard to (build and) install SciRuby gems on Windows.

@cosmo0920
Copy link

Modern building binary included gem, which is called as fat gem, is using rake-compiler-dock.
Or, completely handle building fat gem on Windows like as: https://github.com/cosmo0920/win32-api/blob/master/Rakefile#L61

I think that choosing building fat gem with rake-compiler-dock is better.

@v0dro
Copy link

v0dro commented Sep 12, 2016

What do you think of this - https://rubygems.org/gems/conda?

@kozo2
Copy link
Member Author

kozo2 commented Sep 12, 2016

@v0dro I think this doesn't help much. This gem just installs conda packages.
What we need is not installing but creating Ruby conda packages (or rather I should say binary gem).

@v0dro
Copy link

v0dro commented Sep 17, 2016

We'll need to build something like conda for Ruby I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants