Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Underline Changes since initial submission #249

Closed
mdhaber opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #251
Closed

Underline Changes since initial submission #249

mdhaber opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #251
Assignees

Comments

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Sep 16, 2019

Once #221 and #230 are closed, we should underline the changes since initial submission as requested:

In order to facilitate review of the revised manuscript please provide a point-by-point rebuttal and underline any additions to the text or areas with other significant changes. Please ensure that the revised version is as concise as possible, and that it conforms to our format requirements (see http://www.nature.com/nmeth for our Guide to Authors). We shall return to the issue of format and presentation in the event that the manuscript is accepted for publication.

@jarrodmillman
Copy link
Member

You may be familiar with this already, but just in case:
https://gitlab.com/git-latexdiff/git-latexdiff

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I think @ev-br also recommended latexdiff--this seems like a good companion to the rebuttal letter.

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor Author

mdhaber commented Sep 22, 2019

#251 addressed this

@mdhaber mdhaber closed this as completed Sep 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants