You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I propose we replace “Positive Influence” (open arrowhead) link with “Reduced Physical Stimulation” (white arrowhead) in the outcome file because white arrowheads are in the original file in Newt, they correspond to SBGN (there is no open arrow there), there is no open arrow in SBGN.
To clarify: I use the reduced notation in CellDesigner as a way to have AF there and then in MINERVA, so, basically, we use PD shapes but connect them the way we do in AF.
Please see the images attached.
In Newt:
In CellDesigner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In Newt I used "Type: PD+AF" in map settings to enable mixed drawing and used PD "Macromolecule" shapes together with "Stimulation connectors", also from the PD palette, but connecting directly from macromolecule to macromolecule.
I think it would mean changing one line in the conversion code. For SBGN to CellDesigner direction, replace celldesigner:reactionTypePOSITIVE_INFLUENCE</celldesigner:reactionType> with
celldesigner:reactionTypeREDUCED_PHYSICAL_STIMULATION</celldesigner:reactionType> so it shows SBGN-like white arrowheads
I propose we replace “Positive Influence” (open arrowhead) link with “Reduced Physical Stimulation” (white arrowhead) in the outcome file because white arrowheads are in the original file in Newt, they correspond to SBGN (there is no open arrow there), there is no open arrow in SBGN.
To clarify: I use the reduced notation in CellDesigner as a way to have AF there and then in MINERVA, so, basically, we use PD shapes but connect them the way we do in AF.
Please see the images attached.
In Newt:
In CellDesigner
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: