Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transcript mappability #31

Open
priyanka-surana opened this issue May 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Transcript mappability #31

priyanka-surana opened this issue May 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
feature Requests for new features help wanted Open to anyone interested question Further information is requested

Comments

@priyanka-surana
Copy link

Description of feature

This is ideally done with RNA-seq data. It is equal to percentage of reads mapped to the genome.
Possible software: WGSIM

@priyanka-surana priyanka-surana added enhancement Improvement of the existing features help wanted Open to anyone interested question Further information is requested labels May 2, 2022
@muffato muffato added feature Requests for new features and removed enhancement Improvement of the existing features labels Jun 1, 2024
@tkchafin
Copy link
Contributor

tkchafin commented Oct 1, 2024

According to this paper "mappability' = "the fraction of reads derived from a transcript that aligned to the original transcript" so I think this just involves taking the FASTA + GFF and extracting out the transcripts (as FASTA)

Some various tools I found so far:

Could be worth doing some benchmarking to whittle out the 'slow' options? If the tools allows you to supply the transcript boundaries as bed or similar that might be a nice feature rather than extracting the transcriptome beforehand?

@muffato muffato transferred this issue from sanger-tol/genomenote Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Requests for new features help wanted Open to anyone interested question Further information is requested
Projects
Status: Triage
Status: To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants