diff --git a/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency.rs b/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency.rs
index ce5b8be07f..b33aefaf1d 100644
--- a/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency.rs
+++ b/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency.rs
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ fn static_atomic_bool(val: bool) -> &'static AtomicBool {
     Box::leak(Box::new(AtomicBool::new(val)))
 }
 
-// Spins until it acquires a pre-determined value.
+/// Spins until it acquires a pre-determined value.
 fn loads_value(loc: &AtomicI32, ord: Ordering, val: i32) -> i32 {
     while loc.load(ord) != val {
         std::hint::spin_loop();
@@ -186,31 +186,6 @@ fn test_mixed_access() {
     assert_eq!(r2, 2);
 }
 
-// The following two tests are taken from Repairing Sequential Consistency in C/C++11
-// by Lahav et al.
-// https://plv.mpi-sws.org/scfix/paper.pdf
-
-// Test case SB
-fn test_sc_store_buffering() {
-    let x = static_atomic(0);
-    let y = static_atomic(0);
-
-    let j1 = spawn(move || {
-        x.store(1, SeqCst);
-        y.load(SeqCst)
-    });
-
-    let j2 = spawn(move || {
-        y.store(1, SeqCst);
-        x.load(SeqCst)
-    });
-
-    let a = j1.join().unwrap();
-    let b = j2.join().unwrap();
-
-    assert_ne!((a, b), (0, 0));
-}
-
 fn test_single_thread() {
     let x = AtomicI32::new(42);
 
@@ -257,178 +232,6 @@ fn test_sync_through_rmw_and_fences() {
     assert_ne!((a, b), (0, 0));
 }
 
-// Test case by @SabrinaJewson
-// https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2301#issuecomment-1221502757
-// Demonstrating C++20 SC access changes
-fn test_iriw_sc_rlx() {
-    let x = static_atomic_bool(false);
-    let y = static_atomic_bool(false);
-
-    let a = spawn(move || x.store(true, Relaxed));
-    let b = spawn(move || y.store(true, Relaxed));
-    let c = spawn(move || {
-        while !x.load(SeqCst) {}
-        y.load(SeqCst)
-    });
-    let d = spawn(move || {
-        while !y.load(SeqCst) {}
-        x.load(SeqCst)
-    });
-
-    a.join().unwrap();
-    b.join().unwrap();
-    let c = c.join().unwrap();
-    let d = d.join().unwrap();
-
-    assert!(c || d);
-}
-
-// Similar to `test_iriw_sc_rlx` but with fences instead of SC accesses.
-fn test_cpp20_sc_fence_fix() {
-    let x = static_atomic_bool(false);
-    let y = static_atomic_bool(false);
-
-    let thread1 = spawn(|| {
-        let a = x.load(Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        let b = y.load(Relaxed);
-        (a, b)
-    });
-
-    let thread2 = spawn(|| {
-        x.store(true, Relaxed);
-    });
-    let thread3 = spawn(|| {
-        y.store(true, Relaxed);
-    });
-
-    let thread4 = spawn(|| {
-        let c = y.load(Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        let d = x.load(Relaxed);
-        (c, d)
-    });
-
-    let (a, b) = thread1.join().unwrap();
-    thread2.join().unwrap();
-    thread3.join().unwrap();
-    let (c, d) = thread4.join().unwrap();
-    let bad = a == true && b == false && c == true && d == false;
-    assert!(!bad);
-}
-
-// https://plv.mpi-sws.org/scfix/paper.pdf
-// 2.2 Second Problem: SC Fences are Too Weak
-fn test_cpp20_rwc_syncs() {
-    /*
-    int main() {
-        atomic_int x = 0;
-        atomic_int y = 0;
-        {{{ x.store(1,mo_relaxed);
-        ||| { r1=x.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(1);
-              fence(mo_seq_cst);
-              r2=y.load(mo_relaxed); }
-        ||| { y.store(1,mo_relaxed);
-              fence(mo_seq_cst);
-              r3=x.load(mo_relaxed); }
-        }}}
-        return 0;
-    }
-    */
-    let x = static_atomic(0);
-    let y = static_atomic(0);
-
-    let j1 = spawn(move || {
-        x.store(1, Relaxed);
-    });
-
-    let j2 = spawn(move || {
-        loads_value(&x, Relaxed, 1);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        y.load(Relaxed)
-    });
-
-    let j3 = spawn(move || {
-        y.store(1, Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        x.load(Relaxed)
-    });
-
-    j1.join().unwrap();
-    let b = j2.join().unwrap();
-    let c = j3.join().unwrap();
-
-    assert!((b, c) != (0, 0));
-}
-
-/// This checks that the *last* thing the SC fence does is act like a release fence.
-/// See <https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4057#issuecomment-2522296601>.
-fn test_sc_fence_release() {
-    let x = static_atomic(0);
-    let y = static_atomic(0);
-    let z = static_atomic(0);
-    let k = static_atomic(0);
-
-    let j1 = spawn(move || {
-        x.store(1, Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        k.store(1, Relaxed);
-    });
-    let j2 = spawn(move || {
-        y.store(1, Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        z.store(1, Relaxed);
-    });
-
-    let j3 = spawn(move || {
-        let kval = k.load(Acquire);
-        let yval = y.load(Relaxed);
-        (kval, yval)
-    });
-    let j4 = spawn(move || {
-        let zval = z.load(Acquire);
-        let xval = x.load(Relaxed);
-        (zval, xval)
-    });
-
-    j1.join().unwrap();
-    j2.join().unwrap();
-    let (kval, yval) = j3.join().unwrap();
-    let (zval, xval) = j4.join().unwrap();
-
-    let bad = kval == 1 && yval == 0 && zval == 1 && xval == 0;
-    assert!(!bad);
-}
-
-/// Test that SC fences and accesses sync correctly with each other.
-fn test_sc_fence_access() {
-    /*
-        Wx1 sc
-        Ry0 sc
-        ||
-        Wy1 rlx
-        SC-fence
-        Rx0 rlx
-    */
-    let x = static_atomic(0);
-    let y = static_atomic(0);
-
-    let j1 = spawn(move || {
-        x.store(1, SeqCst);
-        y.load(SeqCst)
-    });
-    let j2 = spawn(move || {
-        y.store(1, Relaxed);
-        fence(SeqCst);
-        x.load(Relaxed)
-    });
-
-    let v1 = j1.join().unwrap();
-    let v2 = j2.join().unwrap();
-    let bad = v1 == 0 && v2 == 0;
-    assert!(!bad);
-}
-
 pub fn main() {
     for _ in 0..50 {
         test_single_thread();
@@ -437,12 +240,6 @@ pub fn main() {
         test_message_passing();
         test_wrc();
         test_corr();
-        test_sc_store_buffering();
         test_sync_through_rmw_and_fences();
-        test_iriw_sc_rlx();
-        test_cpp20_sc_fence_fix();
-        test_cpp20_rwc_syncs();
-        test_sc_fence_release();
-        test_sc_fence_access();
     }
 }
diff --git a/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency_sc.rs b/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency_sc.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bde3eda313
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/pass/0weak_memory_consistency_sc.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+//@compile-flags: -Zmiri-ignore-leaks -Zmiri-disable-stacked-borrows -Zmiri-disable-validation -Zmiri-provenance-gc=10000
+// This test's runtime explodes if the GC interval is set to 1 (which we do in CI), so we
+// override it internally back to the default frequency.
+
+// The following tests check whether our weak memory emulation produces
+// any inconsistent execution outcomes
+// This file here focuses on SC accesses and fences.
+
+use std::sync::atomic::Ordering::*;
+use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, AtomicI32, Ordering, fence};
+use std::thread::spawn;
+
+// We can't create static items because we need to run each test
+// multiple times
+fn static_atomic(val: i32) -> &'static AtomicI32 {
+    Box::leak(Box::new(AtomicI32::new(val)))
+}
+fn static_atomic_bool(val: bool) -> &'static AtomicBool {
+    Box::leak(Box::new(AtomicBool::new(val)))
+}
+
+/// Spins until it acquires a pre-determined value.
+fn loads_value(loc: &AtomicI32, ord: Ordering, val: i32) -> i32 {
+    while loc.load(ord) != val {
+        std::hint::spin_loop();
+    }
+    val
+}
+
+// Test case SB taken from Repairing Sequential Consistency in C/C++11
+// by Lahav et al.
+// https://plv.mpi-sws.org/scfix/paper.pdf
+fn test_sc_store_buffering() {
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, SeqCst);
+        y.load(SeqCst)
+    });
+
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, SeqCst);
+        x.load(SeqCst)
+    });
+
+    let a = j1.join().unwrap();
+    let b = j2.join().unwrap();
+
+    assert_ne!((a, b), (0, 0));
+}
+
+// Test case by @SabrinaJewson
+// https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2301#issuecomment-1221502757
+// Demonstrating C++20 SC access changes
+fn test_iriw_sc_rlx() {
+    let x = static_atomic_bool(false);
+    let y = static_atomic_bool(false);
+
+    let a = spawn(move || x.store(true, Relaxed));
+    let b = spawn(move || y.store(true, Relaxed));
+    let c = spawn(move || {
+        while !x.load(SeqCst) {}
+        y.load(SeqCst)
+    });
+    let d = spawn(move || {
+        while !y.load(SeqCst) {}
+        x.load(SeqCst)
+    });
+
+    a.join().unwrap();
+    b.join().unwrap();
+    let c = c.join().unwrap();
+    let d = d.join().unwrap();
+
+    assert!(c || d);
+}
+
+// Similar to `test_iriw_sc_rlx` but with fences instead of SC accesses.
+fn test_cpp20_sc_fence_fix() {
+    let x = static_atomic_bool(false);
+    let y = static_atomic_bool(false);
+
+    let thread1 = spawn(|| {
+        let a = x.load(Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        let b = y.load(Relaxed);
+        (a, b)
+    });
+
+    let thread2 = spawn(|| {
+        x.store(true, Relaxed);
+    });
+    let thread3 = spawn(|| {
+        y.store(true, Relaxed);
+    });
+
+    let thread4 = spawn(|| {
+        let c = y.load(Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        let d = x.load(Relaxed);
+        (c, d)
+    });
+
+    let (a, b) = thread1.join().unwrap();
+    thread2.join().unwrap();
+    thread3.join().unwrap();
+    let (c, d) = thread4.join().unwrap();
+    let bad = a == true && b == false && c == true && d == false;
+    assert!(!bad);
+}
+
+// https://plv.mpi-sws.org/scfix/paper.pdf
+// 2.2 Second Problem: SC Fences are Too Weak
+fn test_cpp20_rwc_syncs() {
+    /*
+    int main() {
+        atomic_int x = 0;
+        atomic_int y = 0;
+        {{{ x.store(1,mo_relaxed);
+        ||| { r1=x.load(mo_relaxed).readsvalue(1);
+              fence(mo_seq_cst);
+              r2=y.load(mo_relaxed); }
+        ||| { y.store(1,mo_relaxed);
+              fence(mo_seq_cst);
+              r3=x.load(mo_relaxed); }
+        }}}
+        return 0;
+    }
+    */
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, Relaxed);
+    });
+
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        loads_value(&x, Relaxed, 1);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        y.load(Relaxed)
+    });
+
+    let j3 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        x.load(Relaxed)
+    });
+
+    j1.join().unwrap();
+    let b = j2.join().unwrap();
+    let c = j3.join().unwrap();
+
+    assert!((b, c) != (0, 0));
+}
+
+/// This checks that the *last* thing the SC fence does is act like a release fence.
+/// See <https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/4057#issuecomment-2522296601>.
+/// Test by Ori Lahav.
+fn test_sc_fence_release() {
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+    let z = static_atomic(0);
+    let k = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        k.store(1, Relaxed);
+    });
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        z.store(1, Relaxed);
+    });
+
+    let j3 = spawn(move || {
+        let kval = k.load(Acquire); // bad case: loads 1
+        let yval = y.load(Relaxed); // bad case: loads 0
+        (kval, yval)
+    });
+    let j4 = spawn(move || {
+        let zval = z.load(Acquire); // bad case: loads 1
+        let xval = x.load(Relaxed); // bad case: loads 0
+        (zval, xval)
+    });
+
+    j1.join().unwrap();
+    j2.join().unwrap();
+    let (kval, yval) = j3.join().unwrap();
+    let (zval, xval) = j4.join().unwrap();
+
+    let bad = kval == 1 && yval == 0 && zval == 1 && xval == 0;
+    assert!(!bad);
+}
+
+/// Test that SC fences and accesses sync correctly with each other.
+/// Test by Ori Lahav.
+fn test_sc_fence_access() {
+    /*
+        Wx1 sc
+        Ry0 sc
+        ||
+        Wy1 rlx
+        SC-fence
+        Rx0 rlx
+    */
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, SeqCst);
+        y.load(SeqCst)
+    });
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, Relaxed);
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        // If this sees a 0, the fence must have been *before* the x.store(1).
+        x.load(Relaxed)
+    });
+
+    let yval = j1.join().unwrap();
+    let xval = j2.join().unwrap();
+    let bad = yval == 0 && xval == 0;
+    assert!(!bad);
+}
+
+/// Test that SC fences and accesses sync correctly with each other
+/// when mediated by a release-acquire pair.
+/// Test by Ori Lahav.
+fn test_sc_fence_access_relacq() {
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+    let z = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, SeqCst);
+        y.load(SeqCst) // bad case: loads 0
+    });
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, Relaxed);
+        z.store(1, Release)
+    });
+    let j3 = spawn(move || {
+        let zval = z.load(Acquire); // bad case: loads 1
+        // If we see 1 here, the rel-acq pair makes the fence happen after the z.store(1).
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        // If this sees a 0, the fence must have been *before* the x.store(1).
+        let xval = x.load(Relaxed); // bad case: loads 0
+        (zval, xval)
+    });
+
+    let yval = j1.join().unwrap();
+    j2.join().unwrap();
+    let (zval, xval) = j3.join().unwrap();
+    let bad = yval == 0 && zval == 1 && xval == 0;
+    assert!(!bad);
+}
+
+/// A test that involves multiple SC fences and accesses.
+/// Test by Ori Lahav.
+fn test_sc_multi_fence() {
+    let x = static_atomic(0);
+    let y = static_atomic(0);
+    let z = static_atomic(0);
+
+    let j1 = spawn(move || {
+        x.store(1, SeqCst);
+        y.load(SeqCst) // bad case: loads 0
+    });
+    let j2 = spawn(move || {
+        y.store(1, Relaxed);
+        // In the bad case this fence is *after* the j1 y.load, since
+        // otherwise that load would pick up the 1 we just stored.
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        z.load(Relaxed) // bad case: loads 0
+    });
+    let j3 = spawn(move || {
+        z.store(1, Relaxed);
+    });
+    let j4 = spawn(move || {
+        let zval = z.load(Relaxed); // bad case: loads 1
+        // In the bad case this fence is *after* the one above since
+        // otherwise, the j2 load of z would load 1.
+        fence(SeqCst);
+        // Since that fence is in turn after the j1 y.load, our fence is
+        // after the j1 x.store, which means we must pick up that store.
+        let xval = x.load(Relaxed); // bad case: loads 0
+        (zval, xval)
+    });
+
+    let yval = j1.join().unwrap();
+    let zval1 = j2.join().unwrap();
+    j3.join().unwrap();
+    let (zval2, xval) = j4.join().unwrap();
+    let bad = yval == 0 && zval1 == 0 && zval2 == 1 && xval == 0;
+    assert!(!bad);
+}
+
+pub fn main() {
+    for _ in 0..50 {
+        test_sc_store_buffering();
+        test_iriw_sc_rlx();
+        test_cpp20_sc_fence_fix();
+        test_cpp20_rwc_syncs();
+        test_sc_fence_release();
+        test_sc_fence_access();
+        test_sc_fence_access_relacq();
+        test_sc_multi_fence();
+    }
+}