You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need tests that fn-def types are well-formed (and maybe code?). To be well-formed, the where-clauses on the fn must be met. (That said, in the MIR type checker, I am currently adding in implications that will basically always make this true.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nikomatsakis
changed the title
Well-formedness rules: We need tests that fn-def types are well-formed (and maybe code?). To be well-formed, the where-clauses on the fn must be met. (That said, in the MIR type checker, I am currently adding in implications that will basically always make this true.)
Well-formedness rules for fn-def types
Sep 14, 2022
We need tests that fn-def types are well-formed (and maybe code?). To be well-formed, the where-clauses on the fn must be met. (That said, in the MIR type checker, I am currently adding in implications that will basically always make this true.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: