You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for contribution with your code and model weights.
I am wondering is it the same model weight which is reported in the paper [1]? I noticed that in the figure 7, the Dice score of Aorta is reported as 0.947 of 60 volumes of AMOS22.
However, when I tested it by myself, I got a average dice score of 0.883, without any manual pre-/post-processing of the data. Therefore I am a bit confused about the result. I wanna verify whether the model weights used in the paper is the one you shared publicly?
Thank you in advance.
[1] Zhuang, Yan, et al. "MRISegmentator-Abdomen: A Fully Automated Multi-Organ and Structure Segmentation Tool for T1-weighted Abdominal MRI." arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05944 (2024).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for contribution with your code and model weights.
I am wondering is it the same model weight which is reported in the paper [1]? I noticed that in the figure 7, the Dice score of Aorta is reported as 0.947 of 60 volumes of AMOS22.
However, when I tested it by myself, I got a average dice score of 0.883, without any manual pre-/post-processing of the data. Therefore I am a bit confused about the result. I wanna verify whether the model weights used in the paper is the one you shared publicly?
Thank you in advance.
[1] Zhuang, Yan, et al. "MRISegmentator-Abdomen: A Fully Automated Multi-Organ and Structure Segmentation Tool for T1-weighted Abdominal MRI." arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05944 (2024).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: