You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
The approach I have taken is to merge the community as a whole with the WG because the first possess the overall mission and challenges but the second is more structured and has a more defined plan in place, what I wonder is whether or not to leave the ‘Community Management and Engagement’ bit on the title or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At first I thought "Community Management and Engagement" referred to our current WG, which focusses on managing the community and events. However it sounds like the IG should be wider than that. Is it about managing the community, or is it actualy the community?
Outreach and Engagement
o Identify stakeholders and interested parties by exploring the roles and resources required in designing, planning, building, and maintaining Trusted Research Environments.
Would users of TREs be another DARE working group?
A good point, it should read wider than just managing. yet managing IS part of what the IG will do I think, it is about managing what we have while focusing on growing and establishing that community
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Submit the UK TRE Community as a DARE UK IG
Proposal: https://hackmd.io/GFWQ6R3oSg-VPUBs1kZT5w
The approach I have taken is to merge the community as a whole with the WG because the first possess the overall mission and challenges but the second is more structured and has a more defined plan in place, what I wonder is whether or not to leave the ‘Community Management and Engagement’ bit on the title or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: