openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr #1334

praiskup · 2024-02-16T19:52:58Z

Seems like rpm in bootstrap doesn't like the dsFromHeader method:

openSUSE Tumbleweed - ppc64le - OSS              24 kB/s |  11 kB     00:00    
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf-3", line 62, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 201, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
    return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
    return cli_run(cli, base)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 122, in cli_run
    cli.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 1057, in run
    return self.command.run()
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 137, in run
    self._src_deps(pkgspec)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 195, in _src_deps
    ds = h.dsFromHeader('requirename')
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'rpm.hdr' object has no attribute 'dsFromHeader'
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 20s

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

FrostyX · 2024-02-17T11:28:34Z

AttributeError: 'rpm.hdr' object has no attribute 'dsFromHeader'

It's not that easy to find python RPM documentation, so I I am linking how I fixed a similar issue:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/tito/pull/488/files

praiskup · 2024-02-19T06:41:14Z

Mock has been fixed for the dsFromHeader API break: c15bd39

This seems like a DNF4 (plugins-core?) issue in bootstrap chroot, i.e. the openSUSE native DNF bug:

sudo chroot /var/lib/mock/opensuse-tumbleweed-x86_64-bootstrap/root/
# dnf builddep /dummy-pkg-20240219_0732-1.src.rpm 
openSUSE Tumbleweed - x86_64 - OSS                                                                                                              28 MB/s |  56 MB     00:02    
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:15 ago on Mon Feb 19 06:37:18 2024.
allow_vendor_change is disabled. This option is currently not supported for downgrade and distro-sync commands
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 62, in <module>
    main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 201, in user_main
    errcode = main(args)
              ^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
    return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
    return cli_run(cli, base)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 122, in cli_run
    cli.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 1057, in run
    return self.command.run()
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 137, in run
    self._src_deps(pkgspec)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/dnf-plugins/builddep.py", line 195, in _src_deps
    ds = h.dsFromHeader('requirename')
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'rpm.hdr' object has no attribute 'dsFromHeader'

@Conan-Kudo would you mind taking a look, perhaps fixing DNF in Tumbleweed?

praiskup · 2024-02-19T06:50:56Z

The failure is caused by:

INFO: Buildroot is handled by package management downloaded with a bootstrap image:
  rpm-4.19.1.1-1.1.x86_64
  python3-dnf-4.18.0-4.2.noarch
  python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.3.1-2.3.noarch
Finish: chroot init

openSUSE 15.5 seems to work fine with:

  rpm-4.14.3-150400.59.3.1.x86_64
  python3-dnf-4.10.0-bp155.3.10.noarch
  python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.24-bp155.2.9.noarch

Edit: this was nonsense question: ~~Is the tumbleweed image too old?~~

praiskup · 2024-02-21T13:28:52Z

Triage: We should turn the non-working chroot in Fedora Copr at least.

Conan-Kudo · 2024-02-21T13:35:12Z

ping @lkocman

Conan-Kudo · 2024-02-21T13:36:46Z

This is on its way to being fixed, I think? https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1145856

praiskup · 2024-03-04T08:34:51Z

Still broken, but somewhere else:

openSUSE Tumbleweed - x86_64 - OSS                                                                                                                                                                          190 kB/s |  10 kB     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: problem with installed package systemd-presets-branding-MicroOS-20230214-2.4.noarch
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package systemd-presets-branding-MicroOS-20230214-2.4.noarch
  - both package systemd-presets-branding-Kalpa-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss and systemd-presets-branding-Aeon-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss obsolete systemd-presets-branding-MicroOS < 20231005
  - both package systemd-presets-branding-Aeon-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss and systemd-presets-branding-Kalpa-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss obsolete systemd-presets-branding-MicroOS < 20231005
  - package systemd-presets-branding-Aeon-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss conflicts with systemd-presets-branding provided by systemd-presets-branding-Kalpa-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss
  - package systemd-presets-branding-Kalpa-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss conflicts with systemd-presets-branding provided by systemd-presets-branding-Aeon-20231005-1.2.noarch from opensuse-tumbleweed-oss
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
WARNING: DNF command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 20s

praiskup · 2024-03-04T08:38:37Z

Is the tumbleweed bootstrap image broken? Shall we disable bootstrap image for Tumbleweed?

Fixes: rpm-software-management#1334

praiskup · 2024-03-04T11:04:45Z

Fixing in #1343.

The remaining problem is s390x:

openSUSE Tumbleweed - s390x - OSS                                                                                                                                                                           965 kB/s | 988  B     00:00    
Importing GPG key 0x3DBDC284:
 Userid     : "openSUSE Project Signing Key <[email protected]>"
 Fingerprint: 22C0 7BA5 3417 8CD0 2EFE 22AA B88B 2FD4 3DBD C284
 From       : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE
Key imported successfully
openSUSE Tumbleweed - s390x - OSS                                                                                                                                                                           1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00    
Importing GPG key 0x29B700A4:
 Userid     : "openSUSE Project Signing Key <[email protected]>"
 Fingerprint: AD48 5664 E901 B867 051A B15F 35A2 F86E 29B7 00A4
 From       : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Key imported successfully
Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
Public key for MicroOS-release-20240107-1746.1.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: MicroOS-release-20240107-1746.1.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for MicroOS-release-appliance-20240107-1746.1.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: MicroOS-release-appliance-20240107-1746.1.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for ModemManager-1.20.6-2.1.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: ModemManager-1.20.6-2.1.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for NetworkManager-1.44.2-4.2.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: NetworkManager-1.44.2-4.2.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for NetworkManager-bluetooth-1.44.2-4.2.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: NetworkManager-bluetooth-1.44.2-4.2.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for NetworkManager-branding-openSUSE-42.1-6.1.noarch.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: NetworkManager-branding-openSUSE-42.1-6.1.noarch
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for NetworkManager-wwan-1.44.2-4.2.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: NetworkManager-wwan-1.44.2-4.2.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for aaa_base-84.87+git20231023.f347d36-1.1.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: aaa_base-84.87+git20231023.f347d36-1.1.s390x
 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/opensuse/RPM-GPG-KEY-openSUSE-Tumbleweed
Public key for alts-1.2+30.a5431e9-1.1.s390x.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: alts-1.2+30.a5431e9-1.1.s390x

Is Z using a different GPG?

Conan-Kudo · 2024-03-04T11:14:46Z

It shouldn't be? @lkocman, do you know?

Conan-Kudo · 2024-03-04T11:15:41Z

That said, we probably need to explicitly specify openSUSE-release rather than letting it select MicroOS-release.

lkocman · 2024-03-04T11:15:53Z

On TW these are separate projects and I believe we're switching keys ATM to post-quantum. Let me ask Sarah.

Conan-Kudo · 2024-03-04T11:18:05Z

And this reminds me that @DaanDeMeyer also discovered we need to add systemd-presets-branding-openSUSE alongside openSUSE-release to our explicit package install set for bootstrap and chroot setup.

skriesch · 2024-03-04T16:14:19Z

Fixing in #1343.

The remaining problem is s390x:

Is Z using a different GPG?

Here is the used package openSUSE-build-key..
It seems, that there are different keys specific for the architectures in the spec file.

The SUSE Security Team is responsible for the key generation.

fedora-copr-github-bot added this to CPT Kanban Feb 16, 2024

github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs triage in CPT Kanban Feb 16, 2024

praiskup changed the title ~~opensuse build failure~~ openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr Feb 16, 2024

praiskup added configs Issue in mock-core-configs package external This issue depends on issue tracked elsewhere labels Feb 19, 2024

praiskup moved this from Needs triage to In 3 months in CPT Kanban Feb 21, 2024

praiskup added a commit to praiskup/mock that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2024

configs: use repo_arch, not target_arch with openSUSE

06c797c

Fixes: rpm-software-management#1334

praiskup self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024

FrostyX moved this from In 3 months to In Progress in CPT Kanban Mar 4, 2024

praiskup closed this as completed in 90e5e3b Mar 5, 2024

nikromen moved this from In Progress to Done in CPT Kanban Mar 11, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr #1334

openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr #1334

praiskup commented Feb 16, 2024

FrostyX commented Feb 17, 2024

praiskup commented Feb 19, 2024

praiskup commented Feb 19, 2024 •

edited

Loading

praiskup commented Feb 21, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Feb 21, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Feb 21, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

lkocman commented Mar 4, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024

skriesch commented Mar 4, 2024

openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr #1334

openSUSE build fails in Fedora Copr #1334

Comments

praiskup commented Feb 16, 2024

FrostyX commented Feb 17, 2024

praiskup commented Feb 19, 2024

praiskup commented Feb 19, 2024 • edited Loading

praiskup commented Feb 21, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Feb 21, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Feb 21, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024 • edited Loading

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024 • edited Loading

lkocman commented Mar 4, 2024

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024

skriesch commented Mar 4, 2024

praiskup commented Feb 19, 2024 •

edited

Loading

praiskup commented Mar 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Conan-Kudo commented Mar 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading