From 892e9bb0c7a720ea6aea581caa6f608ba9dc0edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavla Kratochvilova <pkratoch@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 13:24:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] modules: Fix transaction table headers for module operations

"Disabling modules" and "Resetting modules" is correct, because the whole
module gets disabled or reset, not individual streams. This is also
consistent with dnf4.
---
 include/libdnf5-cli/output/transaction_table.hpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/libdnf5-cli/output/transaction_table.hpp b/include/libdnf5-cli/output/transaction_table.hpp
index f14453681..523269304 100644
--- a/include/libdnf5-cli/output/transaction_table.hpp
+++ b/include/libdnf5-cli/output/transaction_table.hpp
@@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ class ActionHeaderPrinterModule {
                     text = "Enabling module streams";
                     break;
                 case libdnf5::transaction::TransactionItemAction::DISABLE:
-                    text = "Disabling module streams";
+                    text = "Disabling modules";
                     break;
                 case libdnf5::transaction::TransactionItemAction::RESET:
-                    text = "Resetting module streams";
+                    text = "Resetting modules";
                     break;
                 default:
                     libdnf_throw_assertion(