Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The new BOOLEAN datatype doesn't work in fb... #53

Open
adrianlmm opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

The new BOOLEAN datatype doesn't work in fb... #53

adrianlmm opened this issue Oct 17, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@adrianlmm
Copy link

I'm trying Firebird 3 and in a Select statement if it includes a Boolean column I get the next error:

Specified table includes unsupported datatype (32764) (Fb::Error)

Please add support for the Boolean data type.

Thank tou.

@woblavobla
Copy link

What especially do you mean? Please provide more information. And i think that this adapter is supporting fb 2.5 by default.

@rowland
Copy link
Owner

rowland commented Oct 17, 2016

I haven't tried building it against Firebird 3 yet. If it builds and mostly works, that would be good news and adding boolean types might not be too large a project.

@adrianlmm
Copy link
Author

adrianlmm commented Oct 17, 2016

I have build the gem in Firebird 3 w/o problems, I can make selects and inserts as long there are not Boolean columns in the table, everything else seems to work fine.

@adrianlmm
Copy link
Author

Any updates on this? =)

@fernandobatels
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, too late, but today i implemented the support for boolean datatype on my fork: fernandobatels@1000dca

In the future i will do one pull request, but you can not use my fork, with fb3-support branch, for testing my changes without any problem :)

@rowland
Copy link
Owner

rowland commented Mar 3, 2018

Thanks for your patience. Just merged @fernandobatels PR. fb 0.9.0 is on rubygems.org. Have not personally tested FB 3.

@fernandobatels
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, i think we can close this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants