Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REQUEST: New/alter membership - Florencia Cabral as Member #27

Open
2 tasks done
florcabral opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks done

REQUEST: New/alter membership - Florencia Cabral as Member #27

florcabral opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@florcabral
Copy link
Contributor

Request

Requesting to be added as a Member.

Requirements

Sponsors

  • Canonical

List of contributions to ROS 2 Security Working Group

  • Attending SWG meetings representing Canonical
  • PR for meeting minutes for Nov 9 meeting
@kyrofa
Copy link
Member

kyrofa commented Nov 25, 2021

👍 from me, welcome @florcabral!

@artivis
Copy link
Contributor

artivis commented Nov 25, 2021

@mikaelarguedas Any chance to get yours eyes on this application since such change requires unanimous agreement from approvers?

@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @florcabral for your interest in the ROS-Security WG !

@mikaelarguedas Any chance to get yours eyes on this application since such change requires unanimous agreement from approvers?

Such applications are accepted upon unanimous agreement from Approvers, and are typically based on the applicant's history with the subprojects of the Working Group.

I haven't seen any contribution to sros2 (the only project listed as ROS-Security WG subproject) for a while. Is this still the main criterium for reviewing applications ? If not we may want to reword that part and define what count as active contribution.

If attending meeting and taking minutes qualifies 👍 for this application and welcome!

@artivis
Copy link
Contributor

artivis commented Nov 26, 2021

Hello,
@florcabral just recently join the team, therefore you are right @mikaelarguedas that she does not have much history (yet) with the WG. However we expect her to be fully involved in the WG and to drive some project in the near futur. It is therefore up to you to grant the request now or revisit it in a little while.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants