-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Single threaded ActorRefs for unit testing #177
Comments
IIRC, there isn't and shouldn't be a way. You need a system to run the actors anyway. Also, note that there has been no development on riker since 2021. |
Understood. How do you recommend unit testing behavior in receive function? Thanks |
Do you know of any plans to handoff the project to other owners? |
There were plans to create an organization or something similar, but it never became reality. The original author disappeared multiple times already, without a leaving a clue on what is going on. You are probably better of using a different framework like stakker or coerce. As to your original question: |
Is there a way to get ActorRefs for unit testing without the system context?
actor_cell.rs
isn't a public mod?Does it make sense to be able to use ExtendedCell::new() in unit tests?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: