You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are multiple places in the API spec where an object representing a role's permissions (allowed and denied) is expressed, but I've noticed an inconsistency: Sometimes the fields are allow and deny (example: Set Role Permission), and sometimes they are a and d (example: Create Role). Could this be fixed up and unified in one way or another? It would make some API wrappers' lives easier not needing to include special JSON deserialization logic to handle the same model with differing field names, or having to include redundant model code. 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What do you want to see?
There are multiple places in the API spec where an object representing a role's permissions (allowed and denied) is expressed, but I've noticed an inconsistency: Sometimes the fields are
allow
anddeny
(example: Set Role Permission), and sometimes they area
andd
(example: Create Role). Could this be fixed up and unified in one way or another? It would make some API wrappers' lives easier not needing to include special JSON deserialization logic to handle the same model with differing field names, or having to include redundant model code. 😄The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: