You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for this beautiful work. I was wondering if it make any sense (or possible) to run Treeomics with cancer cell fraction values (ccf) obtained from PyClone/ABSOLUTE?
Thanks,
Rahul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your question. It would not make much sense to use inferred CCFs with Treeomics for multiple reasons: i) a lot of signal to reconstruct phylogenies is lost due to the clustering of many mutations into individual subpopulations and hence Treeomics would not be able find the maximum likelihood solution as well as confidence values; ii) to find well-supported subclones Treeomics evaluates the variant reads and coverage supporting each variant and the number of variants supporting each mutation pattern - without these values a meaningful subclone detection would be impossible; iii) Sun et al (Nature Genetics, 2017) recently showed that inferred subclones often disappear when more regions of a cancer are sampled. Inferring phylogenies based on these non-robust subpopulations could be problematic which we try to avoid.
Hi,
Thanks for this beautiful work. I was wondering if it make any sense (or possible) to run Treeomics with cancer cell fraction values (ccf) obtained from PyClone/ABSOLUTE?
Thanks,
Rahul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: