Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cancer cell fractions instead of sequencing depth #4

Open
rahulk87 opened this issue Jun 12, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Cancer cell fractions instead of sequencing depth #4

rahulk87 opened this issue Jun 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@rahulk87
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for this beautiful work. I was wondering if it make any sense (or possible) to run Treeomics with cancer cell fraction values (ccf) obtained from PyClone/ABSOLUTE?

Thanks,
Rahul

@johannesreiter
Copy link
Member

Hi Rahul,

Thanks for your question. It would not make much sense to use inferred CCFs with Treeomics for multiple reasons: i) a lot of signal to reconstruct phylogenies is lost due to the clustering of many mutations into individual subpopulations and hence Treeomics would not be able find the maximum likelihood solution as well as confidence values; ii) to find well-supported subclones Treeomics evaluates the variant reads and coverage supporting each variant and the number of variants supporting each mutation pattern - without these values a meaningful subclone detection would be impossible; iii) Sun et al (Nature Genetics, 2017) recently showed that inferred subclones often disappear when more regions of a cancer are sampled. Inferring phylogenies based on these non-robust subpopulations could be problematic which we try to avoid.

@rahulk87
Copy link
Author

Thank you so much for your detailed answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants