Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate storage priorities #124

Open
raoulvdberge opened this issue Dec 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Investigate storage priorities #124

raoulvdberge opened this issue Dec 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor

raoulvdberge commented Dec 27, 2021

Do we have to differentiate between insert/extract?
Currently: insert/extract on highest priority first.
Requested: insert on highest priority first, extract on lowest first.
Otherwise: two explicit priorities for insert/extract?

@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 27, 2021
@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge changed the title Investigate priorities Investigate storage priorities Mar 18, 2022
@hvdklauw
Copy link

The reason to insert into high priority and extract from low priority first is that it automatically defragments your network.

Sta you have storage drawers and a drive, if the storage drawer becomes full extra items go into your drive. Then by using said item the ones from the drive get used first this clearing the drive.

Otherwise you have to regularly check your drives to see if they contain items that could go somewhere else and move them by hand.

@adroslice
Copy link

Id love to have separate priorities - I think that the variant under "Requested" wouldn't be intuitive for most users of the mod.
Currently to mitigate the issues caused by having the same insert/extract priorities, I usually have universal (disk) storage on high priority, and specific (external) storage on low priority on extract only. This ensures that items from universal storage get used first, and as long as I don't use interfaces or importers for specific storage, which I normally don't, that works fine.

I think the best solution that would satisfy all would be to leave the default behavior as-is, but have a toggle hiding some more options (as to not overwhelm new players). There, you could have the default option, the extract-inverted option, and a "custom" option where you could specify both. Those details are of course just a suggestion.

@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Contributor Author

raoulvdberge commented Mar 21, 2023

I think the best solution that would satisfy all would be to leave the default behavior as-is, but have a toggle hiding some more options (as to not overwhelm new players). There, you could have the default option, the extract-inverted option, and a "custom" option where you could specify both. Those details are of course just a suggestion.

So, under "Otherwise"?

Otherwise: two explicit priorities for insert/extract?

@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added this to the post-release milestone Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants