-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Model and deploy 10 most commonly used AWS services via Radius #6380
Comments
One thing I want to make sure we think through is what Radius lesson/skill are we teaching in each quickstart? If all of the above quickstarts are identical except for the AWS resource being modeled, then I would argue we only need one of them: a quickstart on modeling and deploying AWS resources. Having more than one makes all of them redundant. Radius quickstarts shouldn't have the main focus be on an external service/concept. You shouldn't learn how to use an S3 blob container in a Radius quickstart, that's what the AWS docs are for. Instead, you can refer to the single "AWS quickstart" to learn how to do AWS, and then swap the resource out for S3. If there are AWS tutorials or examples you want to highlight and "rad-ify", then I would recommend doing a Radius "reference application". We can have an open set of those, focused on rad-ifying other tutorials. I see these fitting much better as a reference app instead of a quickstart. |
I think that there are multiple value propositions to this exercise:
|
Since bicep extensibility provider is built by us for AWS resource types, I think we'll have to provide enough to the AWS users trying to model and deploy different AWS resources in Bicep. I agree quickstarts may not be the ideal place to put this content as Quickstarts are dedicated towards teaching a concept. Long back when we did the competitive analysis on AWS Proton Template , one of the things that we wanted to do differently was to expand our reference apps samples like the extensive template library AWS proton has. This feature will help us move a step toward that. Maybe we can rename the Reference apps page to Sample templates or Reference templates and have all the below content grouped underneath it. AWS
This will help
Similarly, we can have the content grouped for Azure and Kubernetes as well Kubernetes
Azure
|
Overview of the feature request
This feature is to validate the modeling and deployment of the most commonly used AWS services via Radius. This is an exercise to learn the unknowns in the AWS space and figure out the plan for Radius to fill in gaps via features and documentation
Features
Phase 1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: