Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Browse non-LC call numbers #796

Open
awead opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Browse non-LC call numbers #796

awead opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@awead
Copy link
Contributor

awead commented Jul 23, 2021

Call numbers that are not Library of Congress, such as

  • Dewey,
  • ASIS
  • SUDOC

should be browseable in the same way that LC call numbers are.

What Done Looks Like

When I have a item that has holdings with non-LC call numbers, I should be able to see it in the call number browse page along with other ordered items in its classification.

TODO

This is TBA at the moment, but probably:

  1. Create sorted lists using forward and reverse shelf keys for each classification scheme
  2. Call number browse can choose which scheme to browse, ex /browse?starting=100&scheme=dewey
@banukutlu banukutlu added this to the 1.1.x milestone Aug 5, 2021
@banukutlu banukutlu assigned banukutlu and unassigned banukutlu Sep 7, 2021
@ruthtillman ruthtillman added the cat-sunset-essential issues which we need to resolve/launch before sunsetting the CAT label Oct 18, 2021
@banukutlu banukutlu removed the cat-sunset-essential issues which we need to resolve/launch before sunsetting the CAT label Dec 10, 2021
@banukutlu banukutlu removed the on hold label Mar 23, 2022
@banukutlu
Copy link
Contributor

@ruthtillman to think about rules for SUDOC base call numbers

@banukutlu banukutlu self-assigned this Apr 8, 2022
@banukutlu banukutlu modified the milestones: 1.1.x, 1.2.x May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants