Triton is a dynamic binary analysis library. It provides internal components that allow you to build your program analysis tools, automate reverse engineering, perform software verification or just emulate code.
- Dynamic symbolic execution
- Dynamic taint analysis
- AST representation of the x86, x86-64, ARM32 and AArch64 ISA semantic
- Expressions synthesis
- SMT simplification passes
- Lifting to LLVM as well as Z3 and back
- SMT solver interface to Z3 and Bitwuzla
- C++ and Python API
As Triton is a kind of a part-time project, please, don't blame us if it is not fully reliable. Open issues or pull requests are always better than trolling =). However, you can follow the development on twitter @qb_triton.
from triton import *
>>> # Create the Triton context with a defined architecture
>>> ctx = TritonContext(ARCH.X86_64)
>>> # Define concrete values (optional)
>>> ctx.setConcreteRegisterValue(ctx.registers.rip, 0x40000)
>>> # Symbolize data (optional)
>>> ctx.symbolizeRegister(ctx.registers.rax, 'my_rax')
>>> # Execute instructions
>>> ctx.processing(Instruction(b"\x48\x35\x34\x12\x00\x00")) # xor rax, 0x1234
>>> ctx.processing(Instruction(b"\x48\x89\xc1")) # mov rcx, rax
>>> # Get the symbolic expression
>>> rcx_expr = ctx.getSymbolicRegister(ctx.registers.rcx)
>>> print(rcx_expr)
(define-fun ref!8 () (_ BitVec 64) ref!1) ; MOV operation - 0x40006: mov rcx, rax
>>> # Solve constraint
>>> ctx.getModel(rcx_expr.getAst() == 0xdead)
{0: my_rax:64 = 0xcc99}
>>> # 0xcc99 XOR 0x1234 is indeed equal to 0xdead
>>> hex(0xcc99 ^ 0x1234)
'0xdead'Triton relies on the following dependencies:
* libcapstone >= 4.0.x https://github.com/capstone-engine/capstone
* libboost (optional) >= 1.68
* libpython (optional) >= 3.6
* libz3 (optional) >= 4.6.0 https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3
* libbitwuzla (optional) n/a https://github.com/bitwuzla/bitwuzla
* llvm (optional) >= 12
$ git clone https://github.com/JonathanSalwan/Triton
$ cd Triton
$ mkdir build ; cd build
$ cmake ..
$ make -j3
$ sudo make installBy default, LLVM and Bitwuzla are not compiled. If you want to enjoy the full power of Triton, the cmake compile is:
$ cmake -DLLVM_INTERFACE=ON -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=$(llvm-config --prefix) -DBITWUZLA_INTERFACE=ON ..You can use cmake to generate the .sln file of libTriton.
> git clone https://github.com/JonathanSalwan/Triton.git
> cd Triton
> mkdir build
> cd build
> cmake -G "Visual Studio 14 2015 Win64" \
-DBOOST_ROOT="C:/Users/jonathan/Works/Tools/boost_1_61_0" \
-DPYTHON_INCLUDE_DIRS="C:/Python36/include" \
-DPYTHON_LIBRARIES="C:/Python36/libs/python36.lib" \
-DZ3_INCLUDE_DIRS="C:/Users/jonathan/Works/Tools/z3-4.6.0-x64-win/include" \
-DZ3_LIBRARIES="C:/Users/jonathan/Works/Tools/z3-4.6.0-x64-win/bin/libz3.lib" \
-DCAPSTONE_INCLUDE_DIRS="C:/Users/jonathan/Works/Tools/capstone-4.0.2-win64/include" \
-DCAPSTONE_LIBRARIES="C:/Users/jonathan/Works/Tools/capstone-4.0.2-win64/capstone.lib" ..However, if you prefer to directly download the precompiled library, check out our AppVeyor's artefacts. Note that if you use AppVeyor's artefacts, you probably have to install the Visual C++ Redistributable packages for Visual Studio 2012.
Triton is strongly powered by Quarkslab for years but also by several contributors:
- Alberto Garcia Illera - Cruise Automation
- Alexey Vishnyakov - ISP RAS
- Black Binary - n/a
- Christian Heitman - Quarkslab
- Daniil Kuts - ISP RAS
- Jessy Campos - n/a
- Matteo F. - n/a
- Pierrick Brunet - Quarkslab
- PixelRick - n/a
- Romain Thomas - Quarkslab
- And many more
- Ponce: IDA 2016 plugin contest winner! Symbolic Execution just one-click away!
- QSynthesis: Greybox Synthesizer geared for deobfuscation of assembly instructions.
- Pimp: Triton based R2 plugin for concolic execution and total control.
- Exrop: Automatic ROPChain Generation.
-
Greybox Program Synthesis: A New Approach to Attack Dataflow Obfuscation
Talk at: Blackhat USA, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2021. [slide]
Authors: Robin David
Abstract: This talk presents the latest advances in program synthesis applied for deobfuscation. It aims at demystifying this analysis technique by showing how it can be put into action on obfuscation. Especially the implementation Qsynthesis released for this talk shows a complete end-to-end workflow to deobfuscate assembly instructions back in optimized (deobfuscated) instructions reassembled back in the binary. -
From source code to crash test-case through software testing automation
Talk at: C&ESAR, Rennes, France, 2021. [paper] [slide]
Authors: Robin David, Jonathan Salwan, Justin Bourroux
Abstract: This paper present an approach automating the software testing process from a source code to the dynamic testing of the compiled program. More specifically, from a static analysis report indicating alerts on source lines it enables testing to cover these lines dynamically and opportunistically checking whether whether or not they can trigger a crash. The result is a test corpus allowing to cover alerts and to trigger them if they happen to be true positives. This paper discuss the methodology employed to track alerts down in the compiled binary, the testing engines selection process and the results obtained on a TCP/IP stack implementation for embedded and IoT systems. -
Symbolic Security Predicates: Hunt Program Weaknesses
Talk at: Ivannikov ISP RAS Open Conference, Moscow, Russia, 2021. [paper] [slide]
Authors: A.Vishnyakov, V.Logunova, E.Kobrin, D.Kuts, D.Parygina, A.Fedotov
Abstract: Dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) is a powerful method for path exploration during hybrid fuzzing and automatic bug detection. We propose security predicates to effectively detect undefined behavior and memory access violation errors. Initially, we symbolically execute program on paths that don’t trigger any errors (hybrid fuzzing may explore these paths). Then we construct a symbolic security predicate to verify some error condition. Thus, we may change the program data flow to entail null pointer dereference, division by zero, out-of-bounds access, or integer overflow weaknesses. Unlike static analysis, dynamic symbolic execution does not only report errors but also generates new input data to reproduce them. Furthermore, we introduce function semantics modeling for common C/C++ standard library functions. We aim to model the control flow inside a function with a single symbolic formula. This assists bug detection, speeds up path exploration, and overcomes overconstraints in path predicate. We implement the proposed techniques in our dynamic symbolic execution tool Sydr. Thus, we utilize powerful methods from Sydr such as path predicate slicing that eliminates irrelevant constraints.
We present Juliet Dynamic to measure dynamic bug detection tools accuracy. The testing system also verifies that generated inputs trigger sanitizers. We evaluate Sydr accuracy for 11 CWEs from Juliet test suite. Sydr shows 95.59% overall accuracy. We make Sydr evaluation artifacts publicly available to facilitate results reproducibility.
-
Towards Symbolic Pointers Reasoning in Dynamic Symbolic Execution
Talk at: Ivannikov Memorial Workshop, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, 2021. [paper] [slide]
Authors: Daniil Kuts
Abstract: Dynamic symbolic execution is a widely used technique for automated software testing, designed for execution paths exploration and program errors detection. A hybrid approach has recently become widespread, when the main goal of symbolic execution is helping fuzzer increase program coverage. The more branches symbolic executor can invert, the more useful it is for fuzzer. A program control flow often depends on memory values, which are obtained by computing address indexes from user input. However, most DSE tools don't support such dependencies, so they miss some desired program branches. We implement symbolic addresses reasoning on memory reads in our dynamic symbolic execution tool Sydr. Possible memory access regions are determined by either analyzing memory address symbolic expressions, or binary searching with SMT-solver. We propose an enhanced linearization technique to model memory accesses. Different memory modeling methods are compared on the set of programs. Our evaluation shows that symbolic addresses handling allows to discover new symbolic branches and increase the program coverage. -
QSynth: A Program Synthesis based Approach for Binary Code Deobfuscation
Talk at: BAR, San Diego, California, 2020. [paper]
Authors: Robin David, Luigi Coniglio, Mariano Ceccato
Abstract: We present a generic approach leveraging both DSE and program synthesis to successfully synthesize programs obfuscated with Mixed-Boolean-Arithmetic, Data-Encoding or Virtualization. The synthesis algorithm proposed is an offline enumerate synthesis primitive guided by top-down breath-first search. We shows its effectiveness against a state-of-the-art obfuscator and its scalability as it supersedes other similar approaches based on synthesis. We also show its effectiveness in presence of composite obfuscation (combination of various techniques). This ongoing work enlightens the effectiveness of synthesis to target certain kinds of obfuscations and opens the way to more robust algorithms and simplification strategies. -
Sydr: Cutting Edge Dynamic Symbolic Execution
Talk at: Ivannikov ISP RAS Open Conference, Moscow, Russia, 2020. [paper] [slide] [video]
Authors: A.Vishnyakov, A.Fedotov, D.Kuts, A.Novikov, D.Parygina, E.Kobrin, V.Logunova, P.Belecky, S.Kurmangaleev
Abstract: Dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) has enormous amount of applications in computer security (fuzzing, vulnerability discovery, reverse-engineering, etc.). We propose several performance and accuracy improvements for dynamic symbolic execution. Skipping non-symbolic instructions allows to build a path predicate 1.2--3.5 times faster. Symbolic engine simplifies formulas during symbolic execution. Path predicate slicing eliminates irrelevant conjuncts from solver queries. We handle each jump table (switch statement) as multiple branches and describe the method for symbolic execution of multi-threaded programs. The proposed solutions were implemented in Sydr tool. Sydr performs inversion of branches in path predicate. Sydr combines DynamoRIO dynamic binary instrumentation tool with Triton symbolic engine. -
Symbolic Deobfuscation: From Virtualized Code Back to the Original
Talk at: DIMVA, Paris-Saclay, France, 2018. [paper] [slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Sébastien Bardin, Marie-Laure Potet
Abstract: Software protection has taken an important place during the last decade in order to protect legit software against reverse engineering or tampering. Virtualization is considered as one of the very best defenses against such attacks. We present a generic approach based on symbolic path exploration, taint and recompilation allowing to recover, from a virtualized code, a devirtualized code semantically identical to the original one and close in size. We define criteria and metrics to evaluate the relevance of the deobfuscated results in terms of correctness and precision. Finally we propose an open-source setup allowing to evaluate the proposed approach against several forms of virtualization. -
Deobfuscation of VM based software protection
Talk at: SSTIC, Rennes, France, 2017. [french paper] [english slide] [french video]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Sébastien Bardin, Marie-Laure Potet
Abstract: In this presentation we describe an approach which consists to automatically analyze virtual machine based software protections and which recompiles a new version of the binary without such protections. This automated approach relies on a symbolic execution guide by a taint analysis and some concretization policies, then on a binary rewriting using LLVM transition. -
How Triton can help to reverse virtual machine based software protections
Talk at: CSAW SOS, NYC, New York, 2016. [slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Romain Thomas
Abstract: The first part of the talk is going to be an introduction to the Triton framework to expose its components and to explain how they work together. Then, the second part will include demonstrations on how it's possible to reverse virtual machine based protections using taint analysis, symbolic execution, SMT simplifications and LLVM-IR optimizations. -
Dynamic Binary Analysis and Obfuscated Codes
Talk at: St'Hack, Bordeaux, France, 2016. [slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Romain Thomas
Abstract: At this presentation we will talk about how a DBA (Dynamic Binary Analysis) may help a reverse engineer to reverse obfuscated code. We will first introduce some basic obfuscation techniques and then expose how it's possible to break some stuffs (using our open-source DBA framework - Triton) like detect opaque predicates, reconstruct CFG, find the original algorithm, isolate sensible data and many more... Then, we will conclude with a demo and few words about our future work. -
How Triton may help to analyse obfuscated binaries
Publication at: MISC magazine 82, 2015. [french article]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Romain Thomas
Abstract: Binary obfuscation is used to protect software's intellectual property. There exist different kinds of obfucation but roughly, it transforms a binary structure into another binary structure by preserving the same semantic. The aim of obfuscation is to ensure that the original information is "drown" in useless information that will make reverse engineering harder. In this article we will show how we can analyse an ofbuscated program and break some obfuscations using the Triton framework. -
Triton: A Concolic Execution Framework
Talk at: SSTIC, Rennes, France, 2015. [french paper] [detailed english slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan, Florent Saudel
Abstract: This talk is about the release of Triton, a concolic execution framework based on Pin. It provides components like a taint engine, a dynamic symbolic execution engine, a snapshot engine, translation of x64 instruction to SMT2, a Z3 interface to solve constraints and Python bindings. Based on these components, Triton offers the possibility to build tools for vulnerabilities research or reverse-engineering assistance. -
Dynamic Behavior Analysis Using Binary Instrumentation
Talk at: St'Hack, Bordeaux, France, 2015. [slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan
Abstract: This talk can be considered like the part 2 of our talk at SecurityDay. In the previous part, we talked about how it was possible to cover a targeted function in memory using the DSE (Dynamic Symbolic Execution) approach. Cover a function (or its states) doesn't mean find all vulnerabilities, some vulnerability doesn't crashes the program. That's why we must implement specific analysis to find specific bugs. These analysis are based on the binary instrumentation and the runtime behavior analysis of the program. In this talk, we will see how it's possible to find these following kind of bugs : off-by-one, stack / heap overflow, use-after-free, format string and {write, read}-what-where. -
Covering a function using a Dynamic Symbolic Execution approach
Talk at: Security Day, Lille, France, 2015. [slide]
Authors: Jonathan Salwan
Abstract: This talk is about binary analysis and instrumentation. We will see how it's possible to target a specific function, snapshot the context memory/registers before the function, translate the instrumentation into an intermediate representation,apply a taint analysis based on this IR, build/keep formulas for a Dynamic Symbolic Execution (DSE), generate a concrete value to go through a specific path, restore the context memory/register and generate another concrete value to go through another path then repeat this operation until the target function is covered.
@inproceedings{SSTIC2015-Saudel-Salwan,
author = {Saudel, Florent and Salwan, Jonathan},
title = {Triton: A Dynamic Symbolic Execution Framework},
booktitle = {Symposium sur la s{\'{e}}curit{\'{e}} des technologies de l'information
et des communications},
series = {SSTIC},
pages = {31--54},
address = {Rennes, France},
month = jun,
year = {2015},
}