Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Will this be for version 8 pixi as of v8.0.0-beta.6 it is not working #44

Open
xtianus79 opened this issue Oct 28, 2023 · 11 comments
Open

Comments

@xtianus79
Copy link

Hi will this work for version 8?

@ivanpopelyshev
Copy link
Contributor

Its just tehre's no one who has time to do it :)

@bigtimebuddy @GoodBoyDigital any way to make a bounty on it from opencollective?

@xtianus79
Copy link
Author

hi @ivanpopelyshev @bigtimebuddy and @GoodBoyDigital I am willing to pay a bounty if you guys will help. this is vital to my project.

@gnut-neygun
Copy link

I'm also highly interested in this. As the transform-independent line width feature from this package is vital to my project.

@bigtimebuddy
Copy link
Contributor

@xtianus79 if you are interested in sponsoring this plugin, please see this. Happy to facilitate if we can find a hero to do the work.

@gnut-neygun
Copy link

I am actually looking at this to see what I can do myself. But I believe any PRs can not proceed until those @pixi packages for version 8 are published first on npm. (currently there's only pixi.js@pre-release)

@bigtimebuddy
Copy link
Contributor

@pixi packages are not being shipped for v8 and are being deprecated. Only pixi.js will be shipped for v8

@MuTsunTsai
Copy link

I was really looking forward to this, but it then seems that the built-in Graphics of the latest Pixi v8 is already good enough if we have something like this:

const app = new Application();
await app.init({
    // A combination of the following three gives pretty good rendering
    antialias: true,
    resolution: 2,
    autoDensity: true,
    ...
});

I made an example mimicking the "Joint" example. It seems to me that the result is comparably good to Pixi v7 + graphics-smooth. So do we still need to work on v8 support? What do you guys think?

@ivanpopelyshev
Copy link
Contributor

antialias:true + resolution:2 is a performance sink, that's why graphics-smooth exists. For pixi-v8 we need custom graphics batchers first, I'm waiting on this thing: pixijs/pixijs#10702

@Specy
Copy link

Specy commented Aug 31, 2024

Is there some update about this issue? I'm using the library to dynamically create sprites that I then use as textures and it's blocking me from updating to V8. If this won't be worked on, is there an alternative I could use to keep the smooth/antialias look on the textures?

@MuTsunTsai
Copy link

@ivanpopelyshev So accordingly Pixi now supports custom batchers (since v8.4 actually) and pixijs/pixijs#10702 has been closed. Hopefully that means we will see v8 support soon. I'm more than willing if there's anything I can help, as this has been blocking my project from updating Pixi for so long.

@ivanpopelyshev
Copy link
Contributor

@ivanpopelyshev So accordingly Pixi now supports custom batchers (since v8.4 actually) and pixijs/pixijs#10702 has been closed. Hopefully that means we will see v8 support soon. I'm more than willing if there's anything I can help, as this has been blocking my project from updating Pixi for so long.

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants