We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think it will be better to have bash scripts ending with ".sh" extension for the filename just like some.
Maybe it is some reasons behind this ? "init" scripts doesn't have any extensions compare to "locale.sh" for example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, while the scripts ending with .sh extension are libraries, other scripts are executable.
.sh
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I think it will be better to have bash scripts ending with ".sh" extension for the filename just like some.
Maybe it is some reasons behind this ?
"init" scripts doesn't have any extensions compare to "locale.sh" for example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: