You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Question
This is great. Im starting to use this for my conservation projects. But, If used on images that already have keywords assigned in the meta data, such as with exifPro or DigiKam, then these are stripped in the sorting process.
Is there a way around this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @TrapperMcSorley . Are you talking about the images produced after detection (found in the output folder) or the original images that get sorted? The images in the output folder are copies of the originals and are used to draw bounding boxes on them. As such they won't have that sort of metadata. The original images should retain their EXIF metadata after sorting.
Question
This is great. Im starting to use this for my conservation projects. But, If used on images that already have keywords assigned in the meta data, such as with exifPro or DigiKam, then these are stripped in the sorting process.
Is there a way around this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: