You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Previously, we were only displaying the input / output metadata to the user, which was sufficient for our purposes. We can, however, expand the metadata showed in the approval dialogue to be richer and shower more information to the user about their auctions. All the fields are opaque, so there's no risk of a privacy leak.
cc @jessepinho
update: on further reflection, the only other relevant field we should display is the auction ID. With our eventual push towards #1394, the approval dialogue is expressive enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Referencing https://github.com/penumbra-zone/web/pull/1041/files#diff-3e744d2ab8ce04a85b15dc5bdef5573655ddfe9aed91fb38b01c11744ec1336eR87-R98, modify ActionDutchAuctionSchedule and ActionDutchAuctionEnd action views to display more descriptive information about each action. Currently, only the input / output metadata is being rendered to the user.
ActionDutchAuctionWithdraw will not be modified, and is currently shelved: penumbra-zone/penumbra#4219.
Previously, we were only displaying the input / output metadata to the user, which was sufficient for our purposes. We can, however, expand the metadata showed in the approval dialogue to be richer and shower more information to the user about their auctions. All the fields are opaque, so there's no risk of a privacy leak.
cc @jessepinho
update: on further reflection, the only other relevant field we should display is the auction ID. With our eventual push towards #1394, the approval dialogue is expressive enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: