Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distinguish load embedded picture and open email #332

Open
fraf0 opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Distinguish load embedded picture and open email #332

fraf0 opened this issue Sep 23, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@fraf0
Copy link

fraf0 commented Sep 23, 2016

Hi,

The code flag an email "opened" if the embedded link is open. This is logical : to click on the link, an user must have open the email.

The same flag "opened" is used if the user loads embedded image (pixel tracking).

It would be great to distinguish the 2 actions because they not have the same meaning in analyze for a client and can drive to different messages in future sensibilisation actions.

Regards,
fraf

@zeknox
Copy link
Member

zeknox commented Sep 28, 2016

The opened metric is a tough one. We have decided that any user that clicks on the phishing link will automatically increment the opened metric as well. We also will increment the opened metric if the user has loaded all the remote content.

This really isn't an accurate metric because it all depends on the email client that people are viewing with. Some clients will automatically load remote content where some will not. So really the metric is going to be inaccurate to some extent for the most part no matter how you look at it.

@fraf0
Copy link
Author

fraf0 commented Sep 28, 2016

Hi,

I understand this.

As I work on professional phishing simulation, I think in most case, I will have a certain insurance for the mua and his configuration. Maybe some time I will recalculate the statistics directly on Apache log, so I can use appropriate rules according to my client situation.
In my opinion, it's valuable for a client to understand if the embedded email content is loaded or not.

Thanks you for your answer.

Regards,

Fraf

Le 28 sept. 2016 à 17:13, Brandon McCann [email protected] a écrit :

The opened metric is a tough one. We have decided that any user that clicks on the phishing link will automatically increment the opened metric as well. We also will increment the opened metric if the user has loaded all the remote content.

This really isn't an accurate metric because it all depends on the email client that people are viewing with. Some clients will automatically load remote content where some will not. So really the metric is going to be inaccurate to some extent for the most part no matter how you look at it.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@zeknox
Copy link
Member

zeknox commented Sep 28, 2016

You bring up a good point. Perhaps it makes sense to have two separate metrics. 1 for Emails Opened Explicitly, and one that is an Assumed Opened Metric using clicks to factor in the result.

@fraf0
Copy link
Author

fraf0 commented Sep 29, 2016

I would rather say 1 for embedded content loaded and 1 for email assumed opened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants