Projects liveness keep-alive and quality checks

[yangwao]

Hey, I'm from an era that I recall old substrate projects mapping website, which is an amazing initiative, and I really know it must be a tremendous effort to migrate all projects to new system.

However, I was browsing Marketplace and found a few discrepancies where either

• repository was non-existing - an organization can be renamed, repository can be renamed, we don't know until we check?
• non-existing domain of project - either no repository
• showing the initial substrate node template as the first commit
• progress on substrate code is 2 years old

I sense as Marketplace should act as a curated registry of best crafts on Substrate and show the best work of ecosystem towards open source efforts where others could learn;
I would be happy to in some way pool prize to find some meaningful check metric to "measure", score or rank repository in some way that we reach a consensus.

This rank should solely go towards measuring of open-source perpetuity/sustainability of project, not much code quality.
For example, this check would tell me what's, are the odds I, as a developer, can rely on this project in the future.

What do you think?

I'll try to reply here or if there is some group, I can be quickly reached at https://t.me/yangwao

Ref

https://marketplace.substrate.io/projects/sensorium-corporation/ -> https://github.com/sensoriumxr/sensorium-substrate (n/a repository)
https://marketplace.substrate.io/projects/fractapp/ -> https://www.fractapp.com/ (domain n/a)
https://marketplace.substrate.io/projects/shift-project/ -> https://github.com/ShiftNrg/shift-substrate-core (initial commit)
https://marketplace.substrate.io/projects/celer-network/ -> https://github.com/celer-network/cChannel-substrate
https://marketplace.substrate.io/projects/faber/ -> https://github.com/yxf/subwallet