-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: String slicing produces different results with pyarrow string datatype compared to python string type #52434
Comments
Since pandas implementation is just delegating to pyarrow utf8_slice_codeunits, seems difference is caused by upstream arrow code. Is arrow slice intended to be different than python slice?
EDIT: This example is wrong, if step is negative, then start should be len - 1.
Seems pandas in _str_slice does not take into account negative step value when calling arrow compute, its always passed as 0. |
Yeah looks like an issue with the upstream |
@mroeschke I apologize for the confusion, my example was wrong, it seems arrow is producing the correct behavior, for the example:
It looks like pandas is not taking into account that if step is negative, start needs to be len - 1, seems like it's just passing 0. I don't believe this is an upstream issue. |
The difficulty is that you cannot specify xref apache/arrow#28940 |
Ah, I see. Is this still something that should be reported upstream? As the linked issue has been closed. |
Yeah would be worth an issue in pyarrow. apache/arrow#14991 is somewhat related in the sense that |
Opened apache/arrow#34917 |
Closing as awaiting resolution in apache/arrow#34917 |
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
The string above contains pure ascii characters, yet the result does not match the python string result.
Expected Behavior
Behavior with python strings.
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : 478d340
python : 3.8.10.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Windows
OS-release : 10
Version : 10.0.22621
machine : AMD64
processor : Intel64 Family 6 Model 85 Stepping 7, GenuineIntel
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : None
LOCALE : English_United States.1252
pandas : 2.0.0
numpy : 1.24.2
pytz : 2023.3
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 67.5.1
pip : 23.0.1
Cython : None
pytest : 7.0.1
hypothesis : None
sphinx : 4.2.0
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.1.2
IPython : 8.12.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.12.0
bottleneck : None
brotli : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numba : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 11.0.0
pyreadstat : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
snappy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : 0.8.9
xarray : None
xlrd : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : 2023.3
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: