You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in today's BP call, this is a tracking issue to capture discussions around the idea for a special guide for web developers focusing on security best practices. This would could be done with a newly forming group in the W3C w3c/secure-the-web-forward-workshop#42 - potential through a liaison. Details to be worked out. The outcome could be something between a "concise guide" the SCM Best Practices guide in size.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Update: we have a draft charter here: https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2024/swag-cg.html and are now actively looking for participants. As discussed in this week's Best Practices call, we are thinking of inviting BP group members to join the calls of the SWAG community group and do the work there, and then report on that work to the BP working group - and work on at least one joint deliverable.
As discussed in today's BP call, this is a tracking issue to capture discussions around the idea for a special guide for web developers focusing on security best practices. This would could be done with a newly forming group in the W3C w3c/secure-the-web-forward-workshop#42 - potential through a liaison. Details to be worked out. The outcome could be something between a "concise guide" the SCM Best Practices guide in size.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: