Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add special case calculations for lower dimensional vectors - matrices #23

Open
toeklk opened this issue Dec 9, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@toeklk
Copy link
Collaborator

toeklk commented Dec 9, 2017

migrated from Bugzilla #624
status NEW severity enhancement in component wrappers for 0.7.0
Reported in version trunk on platform All
Assigned to: BFL mailinglist

Original attachment names and IDs:

On 2009-02-26 12:50:20 +0100, Tinne De Laet wrote:

  The wrappers can provide faster special case calculations for lower dimension vectors and matrices. This would increase speed in a lot of applications.

On 2009-02-26 12:51:38 +0100, Tinne De Laet wrote:

  Created attachment 390 Adds special case calculation for determinant and inverse for 1 and 2 dimensional boost matrices

On 2009-02-26 12:53:28 +0100, Tinne De Laet wrote:

  Patch (attachment # 390) applied in revision 30007: svn commit Sending src/wrappers/matrix/matrix_BOOST.cpp Sending tests/matrixwrapper_test.cpp Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 30007.

On 2009-02-26 18:06:05 +0100, Klaas Gadeyne wrote:

  1/ Do you have an idea of the performance gain this brings (for a particular system, I know. Do we have a KF test that uses 2D matrices somewhere at this point) 2/ Isn't this something we should try and get in upstream implementations. After all, BFL wants to provide wrappers and leave matrix functionality in matrix libraries (Herman, this must sound like good sixties music in your ears :-) 3/ Since it's committed, you probably could change the status to resolved (unless you were anticipating annoying remarks from retired phd students, that is :-)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant