Github API contributor data vs. git clone / git log #140939
Replies: 3 comments
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Based on my observation, commits are tied to GitHub users via email address. So if you have commit that was authored by Git can use a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Body
What unique identifiers do Github API requests have compared to using git clone for information about contributors?
Can all contributors pulled from the API be found using git clone, and vice versa? Or is there a discrepancy between the two sources?
How does Github's API store contributor data and how does that compare to how Git Clone does it?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions